Answer:
Option 2 is the right answer
Explanation:
When government obtains any evidence though a conduct deemed unconstitutional (unlawful search or seizure), such evidence would be suppressed by the court. When the defendant is brought to court for eventual trial, such evidence would be inadmissible. U.S courts have used this rule in several occasions, to prevent police officers and agents of the government from abusing constitutional rights of the people.
Answer:
the fathers of utilitarianism.
Explanation:
utilitarianism the most common form of consequence oriented reasoning, in which the good resides in the promotion of happiness or the greatest net increase of pleasure over pain.
Information:
An ideal Supreme Court may come accross as scary but, if we think about it it's like any other building. Ususally, it has many pillars suppoting it and is usually decorated in coulourless way.
Extra Information:
Here are some pictures for you to look at if you are stilll finding it difficult to imagine what a supreme court may look like
Answer:
be more specific
Explanation:
If you are talking about the jury then the fait of the person on trial is in your hands