Answer:
correct option is D) The vertical axis crossing point cannot be calculated since the cash inflows are in perpetuity
Explanation:
given data
hair salon spends = $1,000,000
increase cash flow = $220,000 per year
to find out
what dollar value should the NPV profile cross the vertical axis
solution
we know that discount rate is = 0 %
as sum of cash flow is infinite
because cash flow = $220000
cash flow is here perpetual
so we can say that correct option is D) The vertical axis crossing point cannot be calculated since the cash inflows are in perpetuity
<span> such advertisements make use of consumer differences arising out of micro cultures based on different Sex Roles.
Another example of this would be the advertisements of Guns that is aimed to be appealing to Men because the 'sex roles' as the protector seems to be had by Men</span>
Answer:
The answer is B. $180,000
Explanation:
The sum of years' digits method is an accelerated depreciation that is based on the assumption that the productivity of the asset decreases with time.
Here, the sum of the digits are found. In this question, useful life is 5 years. So the sum of the digit is:
5+4+3+2+1 = 15.
April 1 20X4 through March 31 20X6 is 2 years.
First year depreciation is:
5/15 x $300,000
=$100,000
2nd year depreciation is:
4/15 x $300,000
=$80,000
Therefore, accumulated depreciation is
$100,000 + $80,000
$180,000
Answer:
a. No. A state court will do a better job in this case because it exercises unlimited jurisdiction. Moreover, you can only bring your case to a federal court if the amount of your claim is up to $75,000 or the issue is exclusive to the federal court. This is not the case here.
b. Yes and No. We need some additional information about the accident location to help answer this question definitively.
c. No. You should not consider accepting the offered settlement. The jury award is meant to pay for your medical bills and also to help you recover financially as though the accident did not happen in the first place. Accepting any lesser amount after the judgment is rendered is in bad taste. The other party should have negotiated to settle out of court before the final judgment was rendered. But it did not. So, go with the jury award.
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Missed work for 15 weeks
Total medical bills incurred = $50,000
Total lost wages incurred = $15,000
Jury award = $100,000 ($50,000 for medical, $15,000 for lost wages and $35,000 for punitive damages)
Settlement offer = $50,000
Answer:
c. It should process further because the reduction in the cost of the trees is irrelevant.
Explanation:
For the purpose of this Decision,
Benefit of processing further = Sales Value after processing – Sale Value before processing – Further Processing costs
Cost of acquiring trees is a sunk cost already incurred and hence is not relevant
Hence, benefit of processing = (0.80-0.20)*350 – 50
= $160
Hence, the answer is
c. It should process further because the reduction in the cost of the trees is irrelevant.
