The veranda is a porch almost so the ground I take it
The correct answer is C. To persuade the state legislature to support public funding of a sports stadium
Explanation:
An interest group, which is also called an advocacy group or campaign group, is a group whose main purpose is to persuade people or government and have a specific influence on society or policies. These groups are called interest groups because they promote and pursue the interests of some group. Additionally, interest groups can have interests of all types including political, healthy, commercial or religious interests and can use different instruments to achieve their goals such as publicity or campaigns. Considering this, one reason to join these kinds of groups is "to persuade the state legislature to support public funding of a sports stadium", as this means there will be an influence or change on policy (government) and a certain group interests are being pursued (probably athletes or sport fans), which is the purpose of interest groups.
The answer to the question above is "C) Precedent" which is the kind of reasoning that Justice Fortas uses to support his argument when he refers to Keyishian v Board of Regents in the majority opinion for Tinker v Des Moines<span>. The precedent is the kind of reasoning which a person uses by using legal aspect support. Abe Fortas is a man with a law background. Thus, precedent is the most likely kind of reasoning he uses.</span>
