1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
salantis [7]
2 years ago
5

What was a main difference between European and Ethiopian Art?

History
1 answer:
arsen [322]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Ethiopian art from the 4th century until the 20th can be divided into two broad groupings. First comes a distinctive tradition of Christian art, mostly for churches, in forms including painting, crosses, icons, illuminated manuscripts, and other metalwork such as crowns. Secondly there are popular arts and crafts such as textiles, basketry and jewellery, in which Ethiopian traditions are closer to those of other peoples in the region. Whereas in the European view, it is of the figure or the body. Plus, the European paintings lay emphasis on a true representation of the physical appearance of the subject.

You might be interested in
Compare and contrast the Soviet and American space programs up to 1962 - the point that the US sent
lorasvet [3.4K]

Answer:The USSR was consistently one step ahead of the US in the space race

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
After Alexander's death, Egypt was ruled by _____.
dybincka [34]
After Alexander death, Egypt was ruled by : B. Ptolemy

He was a famous philosopher, mathematician , and astronomer from Egypt. During Alexander era, Ptolemy was the Great General of  Macedonian army

hope this helps
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the Mayans promote political unity in their region, and how did they administer their empire?
Kryger [21]

Answer:

PAPI

Explanation:

HEY PAPI COME GET ME

4 0
3 years ago
Monotheistic means _____.
Nadusha1986 [10]
Relating hope this helps
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What means did the Roman Empire use to grow? (4 points)
Ainat [17]
As we know....the Roman Empire was very, very successful.....but if we look closely; I believe it's quite easy to distinguish by which means the Roman Empire used to grow. Rome just loved to war aka conquest other countries...it would use its resources and force them to pay tributaries (payment to the person whom conquered them). They had an incredibly good army..their military techniques were incredibly smart..and they also had war machines; which greatly contributed to their power on the battlefield. As far as I know, Rome rarely made alliances and agreements...Christianity was after the fall of Rome. 

This being said to expand and grow, it's quite obvious that the Roman Empire went on conquests and war to expand and thrive. Alas, all Empires fall...as did the might Roman Empire.

Thus, your answer. 
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which Statement best describes the period known as the old kingdom
    7·2 answers
  • Which of these developments illustrates classical India’s influence on the world today?
    5·1 answer
  • Coud 8 track tapes be ruined by weather?
    7·1 answer
  • Which best describes the main action called for by the Declaration of Independence?
    5·2 answers
  • Was Martin Luther King jr. and George Washington related
    11·2 answers
  • Why was the conquest of Constantinople a<br> "major turning point" in history?
    9·1 answer
  • History question who can solve it ?
    8·1 answer
  • True or false: Unconquerable is being control of what to do​
    10·2 answers
  • What was one motivation for federal lawmakers to pass the Dawes Act of 1887?
    15·2 answers
  • What ideas did the framers of the United States Constitution borrow from the following historical documents:
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!