1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Levart [38]
3 years ago
8

Who was successful at negotiating freeing of the hostages?

History
1 answer:
Norma-Jean [14]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

What was the outcome of the Iran hostage rescue attempt the hostages were successfully rescued by military force the United States was humiliated when the military rescue failed miserably eight hostages were killed during the attempt some hostages were rescued but some remained in Iran?

Explanation:

:)

You might be interested in
How does the rule of law remain constant through changes and growth in society?
hodyreva [135]

Answer:Other important determinants of well-being, such as the proportion of a country that is tropical and the proportion that is urban, as well as economic freedom and the rule of law, are included in the multiple regression estimates. Thus, the sensitivity of poverty and environmental factors to population growth is examined with other factors held constant. Measures of the sensitivity of human well-being–the elasticities of these measures–in response to population growth can be calculated. Norton shows that characteristics such as a nation’s economic freedom and its legal framework are more important in determining the quality of human life and the environment than is population growth

The rule of law is defined in the Oxford English Dictionary as: "The authority and influence of law in society, especially when viewed as a constraint on individual and institutional behavior; (hence) the principle whereby all members of a society (including those in government) are considered equally subject to publicly disclosed legal codes and processes."[2] The term "rule of law" is closely related to "constitutionalism" as well as "Rechtsstaat", and refers to a political situation, not to any specific legal rule

The rule of law implies that every person is subject to the law, including people who are lawmakers, law enforcement officials, and judges.[8] In this sense, it stands in contrast to tyranny or oligarchy where the rulers are held above the law.[citation needed] Lack of the rule of law can be found in both democracies and monarchies, for example when there is neglect or ignorance of the law. The rule of law is more apt to decay if a government has insufficient corrective mechanisms for restoring it.

Explanation:

Most legal theorists believe that the rule of law has purely formal characteristics. For instance, such theorists claim that law requires generality (general rules that apply to classes of persons and behaviors as opposed to individuals), publicity (no secret laws), prospective application (little or no retroactive laws), consistency (no contradictory laws)[38], equality (applied equally throughout all society), and certainty (certainty of application for a given situation), but formalists contend that there are no requirements with regard to the content of the law. Others, including a few legal theorists, believe that the rule of law necessarily entails protection of individual rights. Within legal theory, these two approaches to the rule of law are seen as the two basic alternatives, respectively labelled the formal and substantive approaches. Still, there are other views as well. Some believe that democracy is part of the rule of law.

Fundamentally it means that there is an appropriate system through which things must be done, and all, including those who lead, must follow it. It is important, because if we do not follow the rule of law, we have chaos. Here in the US, it is the rule of law which allows us to have our Republic.

6 0
3 years ago
Why did the allies reject Woodrow wilsons request?
yarga [219]
They wanted germany to pay for ww1.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
this means to approve and is what states must do to proposed constitutional amendments and the senate must do treaties just name
Andrej [43]

Answer:

The states must do to proposed constitutional amendments and the senate must do treaties is described below in details.

Explanation:

Proposed amendments must be approved by three-fourths of the states to take influence. Congress may establish a time deadline for state activity. The Constitution produces that an amendment may be recommended either by the Congress in both the  Senate and the House of Representatives or by a constitutional committee asked for by two-thirds of the State governments.

8 0
3 years ago
Please help ASAP I'll give brainliest
valkas [14]
It ensures constitution Does not change?
5 0
3 years ago
According to Joshua Drake, how much did children get paid each week in todays<br> wages ? *
Vera_Pavlovna [14]

Answer:

Joshua Drake, called in; and Examined. You say you ... When a child gets 3s. a week, does that go much towards its subsistence? —

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In his farewell address, which president issued a warning to the american people "to have . . . as little political connection a
    13·1 answer
  • Which piece of work is considered to have an impact during the American revolution due to the fact that it was written in a way
    12·1 answer
  • Why were entrepreneurs able to earn such good profits in businesses related to
    5·1 answer
  • The principle of the self-determination of nations conflicts with
    5·1 answer
  • What is zeus birthplace?
    7·1 answer
  • In what ways do the Crusades lend themselves to the current mistrust between Christians and
    8·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP I FORGOT TO DO THIS ASSIGNMENT
    12·1 answer
  • • How is the birth of related to gumbo ?
    11·2 answers
  • What is regionalism ?​
    7·2 answers
  • When a candidate is elected by voters state wide , he or she is a ________ candidate
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!