Answer:
A. wastefulness - production inside PPC ; B. Economy growth - PPC shift outwards/rightwards ; C. Economy at Productive Efficiency - production on PPC ; D. Unattainable Production- Outside PPC
Explanation:
PPC is graphical representation of production combinations that an economy can produce, given resources & technology.
PPC is based on assumption : That resources are best efficiently utilised. So, all product combinations ON PPC reflect 'Economy is at Productive Efficiency'
All production points INSIDE PPC reflect inefficient utilisation of resources i.e 'Wastage'
Points OUTSIDE PPC are 'Unattainable Product Combinations'- as they are beyond economy's best optimum production, given resources & technology.
'Economic growth' is increase in resources &/or technology which increases economy's production potential and PPC curve SHIFTS rightwards or outwards.
The correct option is C
<u>Explanation:</u>
The annual profit increase = $400,000
<u>The following formula is to be used in order to calculate the total profit enhancement in five years
</u>
The total profit increase in 5 years = 400000 multiply with 5 = $2,000,000 = $2 million
, As compared to cost of $1 million.
Thus, The correct option is answer (C) To take on the new salon because the expected marginal benefit ($2 million over 5-years) is greater than the estimated marginal cost ($1 million).
Answer:
See the attached picture for detailed answer.
Explanation:
See the attached picture for explanation.
Answer:
The solution and complete explanation for the above question and mentioned conditions is given below in the attached document.i hope my explanation will help you in understanding this particular question.
Explanation:
Answer:
Check the following explanation
Explanation:
a) Usually a contract has the following elements:
Offer
.
Acceptance
.
Consideration
.
Intention to create a legal relationship
.
In the given case, the intention to create a legal relationship is missing. Though Study had sent a written legal contract to Burrow to affirm the contract, Burrow did not show any interest regarding the same. Hence Burrow can’t be sued for breach of contracts. Moreover the confirmation letter sent by Study does not qualify under the Merchant Memo Rule as the involved parties are not merchants. Burrow can use the terms of UCC for his favour. The UCC states that any contract with value more than $500 must be in writing. As the involved amount in this case is $1300, hence this case does not qualify as a contract under UCC.
b) If Study and Burrow were merchants, then the Merchant Memo Rule gets applicable. Then in that case, if 2 merchants enter into an oral contract, which is worth $500 or more and one of the merchant sends a written confirmation for the same, then a contract will be considered enforceable. In such a case, Burrow will be held liable for breach of contract and can be sued by Study.
