Answer:
c, twice for the same crime
Explanation:
Answer:
The British approach appears to be more effective and even more efficient.
Explanation:
The British approach eliminates the tendency of lawyers to coach the witnesses to produce required answers. This means that using the British approach, witnesses are not properly prepared with correctly rehearsed answers to questions. The discovery of the case by both lawyers happens in the courtroom and not at a pretrial stage. With the British approach, courtroom lawyers are responsible for conducting the opening statement, direct examination of witnesses, closing statement, and cross-examination of witnesses.
Answer:
Una crítica epistemológica a la idea neopositivista de ‘racionalidad científica' a partir de un análisis del racismo implícito en los conceptos científicos ortodoxos sobre la diversidad biológica humana durante el periodo de aceptación de las tesis darwinistas sobre el origen evolutivo de nuestra especie.
Explanation:
Answer:
Yes, the patient can file a lawsuit against the physician.
Explanation:
The situation above is related to "medical malpractice." However, this can be classified as a "medical negligence" since it didn't cause injury or harm to the patient. Medical negligence refers to an act that deviates from what is legally accepted in providing care to the patient.
<u>The administration of a wrong medication is considered a medical negligence, even if the patient never took the medications. </u>This is still considered <em>a threat to the patient's overall health. </em>
Other than these, healthcare providers could also be held liable if they <em>mislabeled a medication, prescribed a harmful medication and failed to inform patient about the medication's side effects.</em>