All categories

3 years ago

Did I do this right math functions need fast

Mathematics

2 answers:

Alecsey [184]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

The rate of change of Function A is less than the rate of change of function B.

Other than that, everything else you put is correct.

Step-by-step explanation:

None.

jeka943 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Option A, B and D are correct options.

Step-by-step explanation:

First we will find rate of change of function A and function B

Rate of Change of Function A

The formula used to calculate rate of change is: $Rate\:of\:Change=\frac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1}$

We have x_1=1, y_1=5, x_2=2, y_2=7

Putting values in formula and finding rate of change

$Rate\:of\:Change=\frac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1}\\Rate\:of\:Change=\frac{7-5}{2-1}\\Rate\:of\:Change=\frac{2}{1}\\Rate\:of\:Change=2$

So, Rate of change of Function A = 2

Now, finding y-intercept.

y-intercept is found by putting x =0

Looking at the function, we can write the equation: y=2x+3

Now, put x =0

y=2(0)+3

y=3

So, when x =0, y=3

So, y-intercept is 3 for function A.

Rate of Change of Function A

The formula used to calculate rate of change is: $Rate\:of\:Change=\frac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1}$

We have x_1=1, y_1=1, x_2=2, y_2=4

Putting values in formula and finding rate of change

$Rate\:of\:Change=\frac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1}\\Rate\:of\:Change=\frac{4-1}{2-1}\\Rate\:of\:Change=\frac{3}{1}\\Rate\:of\:Change=3$

So, Rate of change of Function B = 3

Now, finding y-intercept.

y-intercept is found by putting x =0

Looking at the graph, when x=0, y is -2

So, y-intercept is -2 for function B.

We get following answers:

Rate of change of Function A = 2

Rate of change of Function B = 3

y-intercept is 3 for function A.

y-intercept is -2 for function B.

So, The correct options are:

The rate of change of function A and B are positive

The rate of change of function A is less than the rate of change of function B. (Because 2 is less than 3)

The y-intercept of function A is positive, while y-intercept of function B is negative.

So, Option A, B and D are correct options.

You might be interested in

Que número es 40% de 50?

uranmaximum [27]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Sherry brings two containers of cookies to a party. Each container contains 6 cookies. Sally shows up with a dozen cookies. Sand

kotykmax [81]

Answer:

22 cookies

Step-by-step explanation:

A dozen items means 12 number of items.

Number of cookies brought by Sherry = No. of containers multiplied by number of cookies in one container

= 2 $\times$ 6 = 12

Number of cookies brought by Sally = A dozen cookies = 12

Number of cookies brought by Sandy = 2

Number of cookies brought by Sherry, Sally and Sandy together = 12 + 12+2 = 26

Total number of cookies to be brought = 4 dozen = 48 cookies

Number of cookies to be brought by Harry = Total number of cookies to be brought - Number of cookies brought by Sherry, Sally and Sandy together

48 - 26 = 22 cookies

8 0

3 years ago

A. Do some research and find a city that has experienced population growth.

horrorfan [7]

A. The city we will use is Orlando, Florida, and we are going to examine its population growth from 2000 to 2010. According to the census the population of Orlando was 192,157 in 2000 and 238,300 in 2010. To examine this population growth period, we will use the standard population growth equation $N_{t} =N _{0}e^{rt}$
where:
$N(t)$ is the population after $t$ years
$N_{0}$ is the initial population
$t$ is the time in years
$r$ is the growth rate in decimal form
$e$ is the Euler's constant
We now for our investigation that $N(t)=238300$ , $N_{0} =192157$ , and $t=10$ ; lets replace those values in our equation to find $r$ :
$238300=192157e^{10r}$
$e^{10r} = \frac{238300}{192157}$
$ln(e^{10r} )=ln( \frac{238300}{192157} )$
$r= \frac{ln( \frac{238300}{192157}) }{10}$
$r=0.022$
Now lets multiply $r$ by 100% to obtain our growth rate as a percentage:
$(0.022)(100)$ =2.2%
We just show that Orlando's population has been growing at a rate of 2.2% from 2000 to 2010. Its population increased from 192,157 to 238,300 in ten years.

B. Here we will examine the population decline of Detroit, Michigan over a period of ten years: 2000 to 2010.
Population in 2000: 951,307
Population in 2010: 713,777
We know from our investigation that $N(t)=713777$ , $N_{0} =951307$ , and $t=10$ . Just like before, lets replace those values into our equation to find $r$ :
$713777=951307e^{10r}$
$e^{10r} = \frac{713777}{951307}$
$ln(e^{10r} )=ln( \frac{713777}{951307} )$
$r= \frac{ln( \frac{713777}{951307}) }{10}$
$r=-0.029$
$(-0.029)(100)$ = -2.9%.
We just show that Detroit's population has been declining at a rate of 2.2% from 2000 to 2010. Its population increased from 192,157 to 238,300 in ten years.

C. Final equation from point A: $N(t)=192157e^{0.022t}$ .
Final equation from point B: $N(t)=951307e^{-0.029t}$
Similarities: Both have an initial population and use the same Euler's constant.
Differences: In the equation from point A the exponent is positive, which means that the function is growing; whereas, in equation from point B the exponent is negative, which means that the functions is decaying.

D. To find the year in which the population of Orlando will exceed the population of Detroit, we are going equate both equations $N(t)=192157e^{0.022t}$ and $N(t)=951307e^{-0.029t}$ and solve for t:
$192157e^{0.022t} =951307e^{-0.029t}$
$\frac{192157e^{0.022t} }{951307e^{-0.029t} } =1$
$e^{0.051t} = \frac{951307}{192157}$
$ln(e^{0.051t})=ln( \frac{951307}{192157})$
$t= \frac{ln( \frac{951307}{192157}) }{0.051}$
$t=31.36$
We can conclude that if Orlando's population keeps growing at the same rate and Detroit's keeps declining at the same rate, after 31.36 years in May of 2031 Orlando's population will surpass Detroit's population.

E. Since we know that the population of Detroit as 2000 is 951307, twice that population will be $2(951307)=1902614$ . Now we can rewrite our equation as: $N(t)=1902614e^{-0.029t}$ . The last thing we need to do is equate our Orlando's population growth equation with this new one and solve for t:
$192157e^{0.022t} =1902614e^{-0.029t}$
$\frac{192157e^{0.022t} }{1902614e^{-0.029t} } =1$
$e^{0.051t} = \frac{1902614}{192157}$
$ln(e^{0.051t} )=ln( \frac{1902614}{192157} )$
$t= \frac{ln( \frac{1902614}{192157}) }{0.051}$
$t=44.95$
We can conclude that after 45 years in 2045 the population of Orlando will exceed twice the population of Detroit.

8 0

3 years ago

Math Plz Help. Please graph with two points! explain how you found your answer

Softa [21]

X intercept: y = 0
y= -3/4x -4
0 = -3/4 x - 4
4= -3/4 x
4 • -4/3 = x
-5.3 = x
y intercept: x = 0
y = -3/4 x -4
y = -3/4 (0) -4
y = -4
the points are (-5.3, 0) and (0, -4)

3 0

3 years ago

Which of the following correctly indicates whether a triangle can have sides with lengths 3.8, 7.4, and 11, and also provides th

dimaraw [331]

Answer:

I think its c?

Step-by-step explanation:

Im sorry if its wrong.

6 0

3 years ago