If members of Congress were truly delegates for their area then each would have continuous contact with their district. For Senators this would be more difficult as there are only 2 per state and for larger states this would require communicating with millions of people across many miles of land to have face-to-face contact. House Representatives are based on the population of a state and therefore House districts are smaller and easier to manage. Currently they best represent the idea of a delegate to the federal government as they are more able to communicate with their district. With advancements in technology the communication piece is now easier to accomplish. However, as delegates they should also offer more voting on issues they will be voting on in Congress. These votes or polling would truly give the representative a delegate role, if they listen and vote based on majority polling.
What statements do you mean? Well, I also have my answer here:
For millenia Aryan woman has been the nurturer and bearer of offspring. Just as the role of the man and father is clearly outlined by nature so is that of the woman and mother.
With the granting of "equal rights" has come the mistaken perception that the role of the woman and mother is essentially similar to that of the man and father and men and women could and indeed should swap roles. Over the last 10 years or so we have witnessed the absurdity of the "stay at home father", the "househusband" and the "careerwoman/mother".
<span>This unnatural reversal of traditional gender role models will sow the seed of confusion in our young and add to the further destabalisation of western society.</span>
It’s D. They had to move place to follow their food source. And most hadn’t heard of America, they were just following the food.
Explanation:
because nation holidies they will be a band to here families belonging and the different of persons work is a work hard and nothing to be connected to there love ones
What prompted the United States to send supplies to Israel during the Yom Kippur War of 1973 is the <span>Egypt’s support of Syria.
</span>In 1972, Anwar el-Sadat ousted and excluded 20,000 Soviet advisers from Egypt and started new diplomatic channels with Washington<span>, D.C., which, as Israel’s key ally, would be a vital mediator in any future peace talks. Sadat formed a new alliance with Syria, and an attack on Israel was planned.
</span>When the fourth Arab-Israeli war opened on the 6th of October 1973, a lot of Israel’s soldiers were away from their posts observing Yom Kippur--- Day of Atonement. Arab armies made a strong impression on their advances with their up-to-date Soviet weaponry. Soon, Iraqi forces joined the war, and Syria was supported by Jordan.
Many days after, Israel was fully mobilized. The Defense Forces of Israel started beating back the Arab gains at a huge cost to soldiers and equipment.
Airlift of arms of United States aided Israel’s cause, but as a tactic signal of the United States' sympathy for Egypt, President Richard Nixon (1913-94) delayed the emergency military aid for a week.
An Egyptian-Israeli cease-fire was secured by the United Nations on October 25,
