There's no picture for me to know whats true
<u>Answer:</u>
The decision from any journalist that violates the ethics of journalism is "A reporter writes a story about his wife’s company without revealing their relationship" and "A magazine runs a series of articles speculating about a celebrity’s medical history".
Option: (c) and (d)
<u>Explanation:</u>
- Society of Professional Journalists is the organization that represents the entire journalists of United States and it sets the boundary line for the journalist’s activities.
- For any journalist who attempts to write about the company of his wife without any mentioned relationship of theirs, it would violate the law.
- Similarly, it is beyond the ethics to write the series of reports about the medical history of celebrity.
The reason this leads to a conflict of interest, is because allowing politicians the power of redistricting creates a gateway for partisan gerrymandering, which is the act of manipulating the boundaries of an electoral constituency in order to ensure that a party wins seats in specific district.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
Indeed, global warming has been in the foreground of politics and science for quite some time. There have been numerous studies conducted on the effects of global warming and what we might do to mitigate any threats. I think some policymakers are wary of the findings and some can trust that the conclusions are sound for the following reason.
Politicians are wary because, in reality, there are no 100% conclusive arguments that confirm that global warming is the result of humans. For other politicians, the evidence provided by environmental institutions is valid and they are prompt to proclaim that humans are to blame for global warming.
What is real, is that earth scientists think that global warming caused significant climate change in the past. And when they say the past, they mean a time before humans appeared on planet earth.
Climate change or global warming is not new for planet earth. It is a phenomenon that has happened in the past according to scientists and national agencies. It is believed that global warming had caused natural disasters such as the melting of ice caps and the flooding of many lands on Earth, destroying life forms.
That is why right now, many agencies are closely researching climate change. Among those institutions are the US National Academy of Sciences, the Geological Society of America, the American Meteorological Society, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Answer:
Explanation:
There are various steps that can be taken to determine if a piece of news is fake or not. For starters, check if the news outlet reporting this piece of news is a reputable outlet such as CNN or Wall Street Journal. Next would be identifying and researching the author of the news article. Check to see if the author has good credibility and reports only facts. The last big step that can be taken is to compare that piece of news with other news outlets to see if they have covered that same story. News spreads fast and if it is real and important it will be covered by many news outlets at the same time.
