Answer:
1. In<u>ductive argument</u>.
2. <u>Inductive argument.</u>
3. <u>Deductve argument.</u>
Explanation:
1. This argument is inductive. The conclusion is a generalization, that is drawn by a premise, the premise has been obtained out of experimentation.
If two grains of sand have diamons, it doesn´t mean the entire beach is made of them. This argument is not strong because the conclusion is not accurate.
2. This is a deductive argument. This type of argument depends on the logic struture of it. If the premise were to be true, the conclusion would be true also.
It is not a sound argument, because thanksgiving happends every fourth thursday of november. It is an invalid argument because the premise is false, there for the concusion is false.
3. This is an invalid deductive argument. The premise is incorrect, so the conclusion that is being deduce from it is also wrong. It is not a sound argument because if you double the length of the sides of a square, the area would quatriple.
Answer: (4) Rights theorists
Explanation:
According to the question, the observer are taking about the right theorists as the observer are most likely discussing about the actual rights of workers. They deemed that there are various things they cannot do as they do not against as an individual.
As, it is related to the individual rights and they hold the moral rights and they also protect themselves from any type of harmful effects. Therefore, Option (4) is correct as they are related to the particular individual rights.
Answer: Topic Sentence??
Explanation: Without context, I cannot know what they want you to say.
Answer:
CT believes that language development is a process of creative construction, NT believes that language development happens through practicing language use.
Explanation:
The key differences between the Nativist and Constructivist theories is that the CT believes that language development is a process of creative construction, while NT believes that language development happens through practicing language use
It was added to the Constitution to protect the people from the national government from having too much power. Adding the Bill of Rights helped change many people's minds to ratify the Constitution. The bill of rights protects the rights of people in the minority. The minority cannot have their rights taken away.
I hope this helps you.