Answer:
because things can get out of hand
Explanation:
maybe they can use fredom to much that it can go very bad for example if am outside speking tghen its fredoom to speak but if i start saying things bad and ugly and going out naked and stuff
sorry for bad spelling
The question is incomplete. This is the complete question:
The state trial court in Nevada has issued a decision in which a party has been found guilty of fraud. Should a case arise in the future with the same basic fact situation, Nevada courts will be bound by precedent to follow the reasoning and decision of this prior decision.
Answer:
No, should a case arise in the future with the same basic fact situation, Nevada state trial courts will not be bound by precedent to follow the reasoning and decision of this prior decision, because the decisions of trial courts do not use precedents or rulings established in previous legal cases to arrive at decisions on future disputes involving different or entirely new parties.
Answer:
The simple answer is yes a female should be paid the same, but often this is not the case.
Explanation:
Morally, yes a female with the same qualifications and experience should be paid the same salary as the counterpart prior to her, though it is not a law that there can't be a wage gap between women and men and this is most commonly not a reality. Women are often paid less than men with the same degree, qualifications, and experience, especially if the woman is part of a racial minority, or in a male dominated industry. Often, employers are able to find loopholes and reasons, "justifying" this unjust wage gap.
Answer:
1. No not all police officers live up to this code of ethics
2. Cvil rights violation
3. Poor judgement of the situation and lack of following direction.
Explanation:
1. As we have seen online and in the news there have been cases where an officer engages in police brutality.
2. If a police officer is to forceful or aggressive with a civilian it's going against civil rights.
Sovereign immunity takes two forms: (1) immunity from suit (also known as immunity from jurisdiction or adjudication) and (2) immunity from enforcement. The former prevents the assertion of the claim; the latter prevents even a successful litigant from collecting on a judgment,
