Answer:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <ctype.h>
void printHistogram(int counters[]) {
int largest = 0;
int row,i;
for (i = 0; i < 26; i++) {
if (counters[i] > largest) {
largest = counters[i];
}
}
for (row = largest; row > 0; row--) {
for (i = 0; i < 26; i++) {
if (counters[i] >= row) {
putchar(254);
}
else {
putchar(32);
}
putchar(32);
}
putchar('\n');
}
for (i = 0; i < 26; i++) {
putchar('a' + i);
putchar(32);
}
}
int main() {
int counters[26] = { 0 };
int i;
char c;
FILE* f;
fopen_s(&f, "story.txt", "r");
while (!feof(f)) {
c = tolower(fgetc(f));
if (c >= 'a' && c <= 'z') {
counters[c-'a']++;
}
}
for (i = 0; i < 26; i++) {
printf("%c was used %d times.\n", 'a'+i, counters[i]);
}
printf("\nHere is a histogram:\n");
printHistogram(counters);
}
Answer:
Renaming Campaigns
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the factor that wouldn't change this would be Renaming Campaigns. This is because an account's optimization score is an estimate of how well the account/campaign will perform in the near future. Changing the name will not change this score since the campaign is still following the same strategy and therefore the estimates will be the same.
Answer:
Option A, B & C are correct answers .
Explanation:
I'd say B: the amount and type of security placed on an application.
This is a common problem that exists between IT and other user departments. The IT department is well known for closing up certain sites and applications needed by other departments all in the name of security. As a result, it might slow down operations within different department and may cause inefficiency.
