<span>The answer is federalism. Federalism is an arrangement of government in which a composed constitution isolates control between a focal government and provincial or sub-divisional governments. The two sorts of government act specifically upon the general population through their authorities and laws. Power is spread between at least two units with powers isolated between the parts. The quantity of branches in the administration and the way control is isolated isn't the same for all federalist governments.</span>
Puerto Rico was not a scene of battle between Spanish American War.
<span>Like the pyramid of Giza, west africans and Blacks in the African continent were so obsessed with any form of identity from sculpture, drawings, images that each community actually branded persons to, among other reasons, identity with that community. My university, one of the best in my country still has a sculpture of the YORUBA God, Ododuwa, just before you get into campus even admits the vast infiltration of christianity and Islam. I could go on and on and on. Initially, all African art objects were viewed as ethnographic specimens like drawn images of famous men and men but as time progresses people just weren't satisfied so they contrived any kind of identification because they had wars, inter-community strife, and more. The importance of artifacts to the black community until the late 20 century can not be overemphasized. It was a kind of lifeblood because everyone wants to, and had to identify with something because of the prevailing conditions then.</span>
City: Santiago, Chile
1) First established: 12 February 1541. Why: It's the capital of Chile
2) Population: 5.6 million
3) 88.9% white, 9.1% Mapuche, 0.7% Aymara, 0.1% other indigenous groups, 0.3% unspecified
4) Government employee, doctors/health care, and banks
There's the first four I've done for you, gonna have to do the rest yourself though
<span>The main source of slaves in Africa were raids- the slave traders would go into the villages and kidnapped people ( and often killed those that resisted). This was the cheapest way of getting slaves and the slave traders would go for the cheapest way (just manpower to perform the raids). So the correct option is a). Option b) does not make sense - it would not matter where they sell the slaves - they would make profit anyway. option c) seems correct, but the question is asking for "more" slaves - selling goods was how they started obtaining slaves, but to get more slaves, they resorted to kidnapping themselves.</span>
