The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
Was the supposed unfairness of the Treaty a significant contributor to the rise of the Nazi party in Germany--or was it merely a convenient rhetorical tool for German politicians to exploit?
I think that the terms of the Treaty of Versailles were unfavorable for Germany, although, this nation had to assume part of its responsibility for the damage and destruction caused during World War I.
Under the Treaty of Versailles, signed in Paris, France, at the end of World War I, the victorious allies forced Germany to pay for the repairments. It was a fortune. Germany also lost some territories.
Yes, the supposed unfairness of the Treaty was a significant contributor to the rise of the Nazi party in Germany. But let's be honest, the Weimer Republic was not successful to rebuild the country that suffered from poverty. The political conditions were set to the arrival of dictator Adolph Hitler and the Nazi Party. He was the kind of leader Germany needed at that time. He found the perfect circumstances in Germany to flourish.
Answer:
Option: Most people who came seeking gold struck it rich.
Explanation:
California Gold Rush began in 1848, brought more the 300,000 people to California for a search of Gold. The gold rush remained for only seven years in 1855. Finding gold become hard and the trail to California was involved with high risks and probabilities of accidents. Only a few miners made money and struck rich from the Californian Gold Rush.
Answer:
The Greenberg interview provides an insider's view of the Brown vs. Board of Education case; the perspective of the informational article is more distant.
Explanation:
The informational text is the foundation for the reasoning in the interview. "Equal Justice Under Law" refers to everyone despite community and color. In the interview, the court lawsuit was mentioned as a clear exhibition of justice and equality. The passage declared a simple experiment that a prince should consider before finalizing his assistants based on the principle that the borrowed attendant would be honest and trustworthy.
A) strict control
B) safety regulations
C) little interference
D) control business so long as it benefits the wealthy.
are this the answer?
