Interesting question
Usually when you look at something like that construction, you think that AB has been bisected by PQ and that the two segments are perpendicular. They are perpendicular but nowhere is that stated. So the answer is C because all the other answers are wrong.
PQ is congruent AB is not correct. As long as the arcs are equal and meet above and below AB there is no proof of congruency. In your mind widen the compass legs so that they are wider than AB and redraw the arcs. You get a larger PQ, but it has all the original properties of PQ except size.
PQ is not congruent to AQ. How would you prove conguency? You'd have to put both lines into triangles that can be proved congruent. It can't be done.
The two lines are not parallel. They are perpendicular. That can be proven. They meet at right angles to each other (also provable).
Answer:
18.67 m/s²
Step-by-step explanation:
a = ∆v/ t
a= v - u/t
a = 2.8 - 0 / 0.15
a = 2.8 / 0.15
a = 18.67 m/s²
The third equation is correct. The easiest way to solve a problem like this is to plug the x-values from the chart into the equations and see which one equals the y-value in the chart.
4x + 3y = 54 (1)
3x + 9y = 108 (2)
Multiply (1) by (-3)
-12x - 9y = -162
3x + 9y = 108
---------------------add
-9x = -54
x = 6
plug x = 6 into (1) to find y
4(6) + 3y = 54
24 + 3y = 54
3y = 30
y = 10
Answer
(6 , 10)
Hope it helps.
1, 24; 2, 12; 3, 8; 4, 6. mix and match for the codes but that's like 100+ combinations and I don't have that kind of time sorry
