<span>The traditional view is that the optimum level of inspection is where the sum of inspection costs and the costs of passing defects is equal.
The optimum level of inspection is a company catching defects and making sure they are not letting a lot of defects slip by. The goal is to keep them under the average for the industry and as close to allowing no defects to slip through to consumers as possible.
</span>
<span>In most cases, the company is not simply seeking a sale. rather, it wants to engage the customer over the long haul in a mutually profitable relationship. With this kind of goal, a company will have a higher chance of prosperity and stability in the long run.</span>
Answer:
D) According to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Edie can be required to retire at a certain age, because she is in an occupation where evidence exists that ability to perform the job diminishes significantly with age.
Explanation:
Since in the question it is mentioned that edie wants to fight the rulling that depend upon the age discrimination so here we considered the option d as in that it is given that edie needs to retire at the specific age as she belongs from occupation in which the evidence is existed that shows the capability to perform the job which reduced within the age
Answer:
The Pacific have to charge the customer to achieve that operating income is $17892.
Explanation:
The target Price Pacific should charge to $17892 as it covers the target operating income as well as it covers the total cost of project. The total cost of project is at the level of $16265 x (100 + 10) / 100 = $17892. The difference of $1627 indicates the operating profit of company. Therefore, Pacific should charge 10% the cost of Job for Client 76.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "D": Justifies ignoring the matching principle or the realization principle in certain circumstances.
Explanation:
According to the General Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), the materiality principle states that some accounting transactions could be ignored as long as they do not affect the Financial Statements. The issue relies on the accountant deciding which transactions to ignore since there is not a set guide established by the GAAP stating what could or could not be ignored.
Thus, <em>the matching or realization principle could be ignored as long as the transactions involved do not affect the Financial Statements.</em>