According to Churchill, the Battle of France lost because France could not handle the power of the armored columns.
The Battle of France, also known as the Fall of France, was the German invasion of France and the Low Countries during the Second World War.
The battle protracted from May 10th to June 25th in 1940 after the end of the period of waiting following the German invasion of Poland in 1939.
The Battle of France is considered even today as one of the most important battles of World War II in Europe.
Answer:
You have to sort which are republican and which are democratic things
Explanation:
Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
Kalani and lael are students who have been comparing the total kinetic energy of an iceberg to an ice cube
Kalani’s Argument: My claim is that an iceberg has more total kinetic energy (thermal energy) than an ice cube. This is because even though an iceberg is about the same temperature as an ice cube, it is also much larger, so it is made of a lot more molecules. For this reason, an iceberg will have more total kinetic energy (thermal energy) than an ice cube.
Lael's Argument: An iceberg has more total kinetic energy (thermal energy) than an ice cube because it is larger and made of more molecules. This matters because molecules move, and moving things have kinetic energy, so each molecule adds its kinetic energy to the total. Since the iceberg and the ice cube are around the same temperature, the fact that the iceberg has extra molecules means that it will have more total kinetic energy (thermal energy).
Which argument is more convincing?
Answer:
Kalani's argument is more convincing.
Explanation:
Lael says that the fact that Icebrg has extra molecules means that it has greater kinetic energy and this is not true, since the kinetic energy is greater in bodies and objects that have greater speed. In addition, speed increases as a body has greater mass. In this case, we can consider Kalani's argument as more convincing, since she related the kinetic energy to the mass of the iceberg.
The answer would be a references page.
I think the implicit meanings of words in poetry show that not everything has to be spelled out in black and whites but such things as metaphors can be used, and symbols of things like a casket and death and irony to make light of serious things to point out the absurdity of situations. A metaphor could be like comparing life to a hockey game wherein one game is lost but with persistence, the next game can be won and also life can be like a tree in winter that it looks dead but actually it gives birth to beautiful blossoms in the spring for example.
