Answer:
1. The author's argument is that evolutions in language such as "textspeak" do not ruin our language, rather, they are creative ways of incorporating symbols in technology.
2. The author claims that
a. Changes in language do not demonstrate decay, rather they indicate flexibility.
b. Emoticons are not just faces. They convey feelings.
c. The use of emoticons in language makes ideas to be better clarified. They ease the flow of conversations.
d. A symbol can communicate an entire message.
3. Reasons to support the claims
a. History shows that people have always complained about changes in language but time shows that these changes are not harmful but rather innovations.
b. Emoticons convey feelings of happiness, sadness, or anger during text communications. These symbols aid the flow of communication and clarifies ideas that would otherwise not be understood because the communicators cannot see each other physically.
Explanation:
In the article by Lauren Collister, she argues against the popular belief that emoticons are ruining language. She rather believes that these symbols are innovations that should be embraced by all because they ease the flow of communication. Dating back to A.D 63 when some Latin students began writing the French Language, a scholar tagged the language an "artificial language". Today, this is the language of an entire people.
Innovations in language are to be embraced not rejected.
Answer: In am interested in a career in law.
Explanation: I think that for a career in law, it is necessary to know about literature and read a lot. I think reading and literature are important if someone wants to be a good attorney so a course in literature would be good in order to develop one's diction and persuasive traits.
Answer:
The three options that state the benefits that are the right of every child are:
B. moral and material security
D. medical care before and after birth
E. privacy at home and in the community
Explanation:
According to the Declaration of the Rights of the Child, all children have a right to protection is terms of "health or physical, mental, spiritual, moral or social development." In other words, they are entitled to moral and material security.
Also, the child "needs special safeguards and care, including appropriate legal protection, before as well as after birth,” which includes health care, as is developed in other parts of the Declaration. As a matter of fact, according to the document, both the mother and the child should receive medical care before and after birth.
Finally, "no child shall be subjected to [...] interference with his or her privacy, family, or correspondence, nor to unlawful attacks on his or her honour and reputation." In other words, children have the right to have their privacy protected. Be it in their homes or in their communities, no one should disrespect a child's privacy.
Answer:
Look below
Explanation:
1. People have relied on dogs for many generations.
2. They have been used for hunting and companionship.
3. A dog's nose and ears are very sensitive.
4. Inside the palace hall it was all grandeur.
5. Flower garlands were interwoven with sparkling pearls.
6. The wooden stage was decorated with a painted backcloth.
7. Writing has kept me at heart for young children.
8. When I was seventeen, I took to writing for children.
9. Children today are hooked to edgy fiction.
10. No other man ever did so much for his country as he did.
Hope this helps ! :)
Answer and Explanation:
The context clues allowed me to understand that the word "adopt" had the meaning of "use". This conclusion can be drawn, because the context shows that several authors were inspired by the work "The legend of Arthur" to create their stories. In this way, we can contextualize that these inspirations caused these authors to use original terms from "The legend of Arthur" in the works they wrote, thus allowing them to "adopt" these terms, that is, they used terms that had not been generated by they.
