1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
timama [110]
3 years ago
9

Why is ‘Polytheism’ considered as a grave injustice? btw this is a islamic question and there is no islamic in pick a subject th

ats y i choosed history
History
1 answer:
Andre45 [30]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

There is only one God in the universe.

Explanation:

‘Polytheism’ is considered as a grave injustice in the religion of Islam because there is only one God in the universe Who controls everything in the Universe. In Islam, Polytheism is the belief in or worship of more than one god which is against the ideology and beliefs of Islam. In Islam, Muslims worship only one God named Allah who is the creator of all universe and has ultimate power.

You might be interested in
When was slavery outlawed in the north? Why is this important?<br><br> *Will mark as brainliest*
ValentinkaMS [17]
It was outlawed in 1804, and it not only declared the colonies free of Britain but it helped to inspire Vermont to abolish slavery in its 1777 state constitution. Hope this helps.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What measures did the Soviet Union take to reduce its food shortages?
german
Created Ukrainian collectives
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did colonies help Greece
Allushta [10]
The colonies helped them trade <span>acquisition of resources, and relief from </span>population growth<span>, famine, and drought. </span>
8 0
3 years ago
7. Pepsi is the choice of your generation unlike Coke.
Luden [163]

Answer:

coke is way better

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Describe the significance of Grant’s meeting Lee at the Appomattox Courthouse. please
77julia77 [94]

Answer:

HE GENTLEMEN'S AGREEMENT

See "The Surrender" painting by Keith Rocco

On the morning of April 9, while General Robert E . Lee realized that the retreat of his beleaguered army had finally been halted, U. S. Grant was riding toward Appomattox Court House where Union Cavalry, followed by infantry from the V, XXIV, and XXV Corps had blocked the Confederate path. Lee had sent a letter to Grant requesting a meeting to discuss his army's surrender and this letter overtook Grant and his party just before noon about four miles west of Walker's Church (present-day Hixburg). Grant, who had been suffering from a severe headache, later remembered that upon reading Lee's letter the pain in his head had disappeared. He stopped to prepare his reply to Lee, writing that he would push to the front to meet him.

The location of the meeting was left to Lee's discretion. Lt. Colonel Orville E . Babcock and his orderly, Capt. Dunn, took Grant's reply and rode ahead. Babcock found Lee resting under an apple tree near the Appomattox River. After reading Grant's letter, Lee, his Aide-de-Camp Lt. Colonel Charles Marshall, and Private Joshua O. Johns rode toward Appomattox Court House accompanied by Federal Officers Lt. Col. Babcock and Capt. William McKee Dunn. Marshall and Johns rode ahead of Lee in order to find a place for the generals to confer. As Marshall passed through the village he saw Wilmer McLean in the vicinity of the courthouse. He asked McLean if he knew of a suitable location, and McLean took him to an empty structure that was without furniture. Marshall immediately rejected this offer. Then McLean offered his own home. After seeing the comfortable country abode, Marshall readily accepted and sent Private Johns back to inform General Lee that a meeting site had been found.

Lee arrived at the McLean house about one o'clock and took a seat in the parlor. A half hour later, the sound of horses on the stage road signalled the approach of General Grant. Entering the house, Grant greeted Lee in the center of the room. The generals presented a contrasting appearance; Lee in a new uniform and Grant in his mud-spattered field uniform. Grant, who remembered meeting Lee once during the Mexican War, asked the Confederate general if he recalled their meeting. Lee replied that he did, and the two conversed in a very cordial manner, for approximately 25 minutes. The subject had not yet gotten around to surrender until finally, Lee, feeling the anguish of defeat, brought Grant's attention to it. Grant, who later confessed to being embarrassed at having to ask for the surrender from Lee, said simply that the terms would be just as he had outlined them in a previous letter.

The terms would parole officers and enlisted men but required that all Confederate military equipment be relinquished. The discussion between the generals then drifted into the prospects for peace, but Lee, once again taking the lead, asked Grant to put his terms in writing. When Grant finished, he handed the terms to his former adversary, and Lee -- first donning spectacles used for reading-- quietly looked them over. When he finished reading, the bespectacled Lee looked up at Grant and remarked "This will have a very happy effect on my army." Lee asked if the terms allowed his men to keep their horses, for in the Confederate army men owned their mounts. Lee explained that his men would need these animals to farm once they returned to civilian life. Grant responded that he would not change the terms as written (which had no provisions allowing private soldiers to keep their mounts) but would order his officers to allow any Confederate claiming a horse or a mule to keep it. General Lee agreed that this concession would go a long way toward promoting healing. Grant's generosity extended further. When Lee mentioned that his men had been without rations for several days, the Union commander arranged for 25, 000 rations to be sent to the hungry Confederates. After formal copies of the surrender terms, and Lee's acceptance, had been drafted and exchanged, the meeting ended.

In a war that was marked by such divisiveness and bitter fighting, it is remarkable that it ended so simply. Grant's compassion and generosity did much to allay the emotions of the Confederate troops. As for Robert E. Lee, he realized that the best course was for his men to return home and resume their lives as American citizens.

Before he met with General Grant, one of Lee's officers (General E. Porter Alexander) had suggested fighting a guerilla war, but Lee had rejected the idea. It would only cause more pain and suffering for a cause that was lost. The character of both Lee and Grant was of such a high order that the surrender of the Army of Northern Virginia has been called "The Gentlemen's Agreement."

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • An accomplishment of George Washington after the Battle of Bunker Hill in 1775 was to
    12·2 answers
  • Which of the following is not a requirement for a treaty?
    13·1 answer
  • After gaining power, what actions did Stalin take to secure it
    14·1 answer
  • Describe federalism ,andswer the question please help me.
    5·1 answer
  • I don’t get it please help
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following best states the main reason for the Union’s success in the West during the Civil War? The Union had stron
    14·2 answers
  • What geographic feature made possible the union off upper and lower egypt?
    7·1 answer
  • Why do you think people from other lands, such as Lafayette and Pulaski, were willing to risk their lives to help American cause
    15·1 answer
  • Which description best illustrates an interest group's use of public pressure to indirectly influence policy? A. Filing a lawsui
    9·2 answers
  • In the United
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!