It might not tell you how healthy a person is because most of the time people's bodies weigh differently like for example a person may be 175 it's not really stomach fat that consists of it may be the breast and the thighs .

8 0

4 years ago

For an ANOVA comparing three treatment conditions, rejecting the null hypothesis is equivalent to concluding that all three trea

Elena L [17]

Answer: False.

Explanation:

ANOVA is an acronym that stands for analysis of variance.

We use ANOVA to test whether there is significant difference between the means.

For an ANOVA comparing three treatment conditions,

Null hypothesis: The mean is the same for all groups.

= $H_0:\mu_1=\mu_2=\mu_3$

Alternative hypothesis: There is a significant difference between the means.

$H_a:\mu_1\neq\mu_2\neq\mu_3$

By rejecting the null hypothesis is equivalent to " not all of the means are equal."

Then we find which treatment is the most important among the pairwise comparison using t-distribution.

Hence, the given statement is False.

5 0

3 years ago

BRAINLIEST IF CORRECT 57 POINTS!! REPORTED IF INCORRECT.

Kipish [7]

Answer:

Explanation:

RDAs do not prevent disease; they are only guidelines so not option A
RDAs can change based on age, sex, and activity level so not C
RDAs are set by the Food and Nutrition Board of the Institute of Medicine so not D
If you look on food packaging, it says "recommended daily amounts based on a 2000 calorie diet" so by that and the process of elimination, we can conclude that B is correct.

4 0

3 years ago

u people that I have answered one or two of Ur questions should pls mark me brainlest . I really need it now​

u people that I have answered one or two of Ur questions should pls mark me brainlest . I really need it now