The answer to this question is Seriation.
The answer is a cultural meaning of illness. In this sense, people perceived the gay cancer is a kind of disease for homosexuals. They based this idea on the number of people dying from the said disease and from the conservative belief that men and women should be attracted to opposite gender and not the same sex.
Answer: a. complementing
Explanation: Non-verbal messages such as facial expressions and maintaining eye contact serve different functions. Here, John pats Aaron on the shoulder while saying "You're the best!" John's non-verbal message complements his verbal message. By adding this gesture, it emphasizes what he is saying.
Non-verbal communication may also substitute, accent or regulate a spoken/verbal message.
Answer:
Increase; not change
Explanation:
If the minimum wages tend to exceed the market clearing wages which is the wages in which the supply of labour equal to the demand for labour the labour supply will increased and the numbers of unemployed workers will definitely INCREASED while the number of the already employed workers will NOT CHANGE it will remain the same because the supply of labour did not equal the demand for labour since the minimum wages has exceeded the market clearing wages.
The numbers of supply has increased leading to the numbers of unemployed workers to increased because their is supply but no demand.
Therefore increased in supply of labour = increased in unemployed workers.
In a study by Briol and Petty, participants were exposed to strong or weak arguments on a topic while either shaking their heads or nodding their heads. A person would be more persuaded if they were shaking their head while listening to a flimsy argument.
Not all fallacious are inherently weak arguments. Because it is unfounded, an argument may be poor. Solving a mathematical equation is a classic example; if you made a mistake in the proof, it would not be regarded as "weak argument," just invalid. Because you only need to check for logical mistakes throughout the deductive process, invalid arguments are frequently simpler to identify.
A weak argument can't be flawed if it is based on untrue premises. For instance, "Video game playing encourages violent behaviour. This person spends a lot of time playing video games, so violence is probably in their future. The weak argument that playing video games is associated with violence is false, thus even though the argument is compelling, it is still flawed.
Learn more about weak argument here
brainly.com/question/13576121
#SPJ4
