Answer: (B).
"Hygiene factors" are the extrinsic factors that create job dissatisfaction.
Explanation:
Frederick Herzberg's theory states that some factors in the organization lead to job satisfaction while others cause job dissatisfaction.
According to him, the presence of motivators (such as; recognition and employee involvement) in an organization lead to job satisfaction.
He also stated that when "hygiene factors" (such as conducive working conditions, good supervision and job security) are absent, it causes dissatisfaction in the workplace, even though their presence don't improve job satisfaction.
Answer: In response to aggressive marketing by the “big three” multinational credit bureaus – Equifax, Experian and TransUnion – employers, landlords and insurance companies now use credit reports and scores to make decisions that have major bearing on our social and economic opportunities. These days, your credit history can make or break whether you get a job or apartment, or access to decent, affordable insurance and loans. Credit reports and scores are not race neutral. Rather, they embed existing racial inequities in our credit system and economy – to the point that a person’s credit information serves as a proxy for race. For decades, banks have systematically redlined black and Latino neighborhoods, refusing to make conventional loans or locate branches in non-white and lower-income areas, notwithstanding laws that obligate banks to meet the credit needs of all communities they serve, consistent with safe and sound banking operations. Thanks to financial services deregulation and the advent of asset-backed securitization, a multi-billion dollar “fringe” financial system has filled the void, characterized by high-cost, destabilizing products and services, from payday loans to check-cashers – which banks typically also own or finance.
Explanation:
Answer:
Owners Equity/Net Worth is $106,080
<u>Explanation:</u>
<u>Assets</u>
Cash $33,700
Supplies $5,780
Accounts Receivable $12,600
Equipment <u>$77,400</u>
Total Assets <u>$129,480</u>
<u>Liabilities</u>
Accounts Payable $23,400
<em>Owners Equity (Balance) </em><u><em>$106,080</em></u>
Total Liabilities and Equity <u>$129,480</u>
Table/indexed.
Let's look at the three options and see what their advantages and disadvantages are:
Contiguous - In this scheme, the file is stored in contiguous blocks of the disk. It allows for easy random access of the data, but requires a contiguous sequence of blocks large enough to handle the entire file. Since the size of the file specified in this question varies quite a bit over it's lifespan, you're either going to be wasting a lot of space by having an allocation large enough to handle the maximum sized file, or the file will need to be copied whenever it grows and "bumps" into a file that was allocated after it. Because of this, this method is not the best.
Linked - The file is stored as a single, or double linked list of file blocks. This allows for the file to grow or shrink as needed, using only the amount of space needed for the file. Unfortunately, this storage scheme doesn't allow for random access of the file contents and the file can only be accessed sequentially. The question for this problem doesn't specify how the file is being accessed, so as long as random access isn't required, then this would be a reasonable allocation scheme. But I'm assuming that random access will be required, in which case, this scheme isn't ideal.
table/indexed - In this scheme, some disk blocks are used as tables to point to other disk blocks that actually contain the file data. It's almost as fast as contiguous allocation for random access of the file contents, yet allows for the growth and shrinkage of a file like linked allocation. As such, it handles all use cases at a relatively minor cost in total storage required. So this would be the most appropriate allocation scheme since the file access behavior wasn't specified in this question.
The answer would be a. Have the ability to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies of the investee
