Answer:
i agree with you, none of them is "better". whoever asks that question is a bit off themselve
skin tone, technology of the civiliation, wealth, access to slavery, even heights n dress sense were things that used to differentiate who is better back in the days.....actually we prob still use those critieria now to differentiate one group vs antoerh now
Explanation:
Answer:
D. 1969 ( The united States announces a plan to begin withdrawing U.S troops from Vietnam.
Explanation:
Vietnamization was a war policy that was initiated and adopted by President Nixon in Vietnam in 1969 by the U.S to start withdrawing their troops from Vietnam. The withdrawal was necessitated as result of increase reliance in the S.Vietnam Army which lead to U.S withdrawing up to 540,000 of his army from South Vietnam.
However, it must be noted that the withdrawal lead to the South Vietnam taking responsibilities in the fighting the war but the American's made support with cash, weapon and military advice.
Answer:
Sixty years ago, Allied political leaders and military commanders at the highest strategic levels fretfully considered the question of when the war in Europe would end and what that end would look like. Guessing would not be useful, and hopes could not be blind. The coming of the end of the war needed to be a matter of educated assessment, flexible planning and unprecedented coordination within government and the armed services.
Fortunately, Winston Spencer Churchill proved to be a master at meeting all of those demands. Britain’s prime minister had an uncanny ability to anticipate the course of events and to encourage or admonish as necessary. Above all, Churchill clearly foresaw the end of war in Europe. He showed such sound judgment, in fact, that one could say his predictions make a handsome bookend to his other, long-recognized predictions in the 1930s about the coming of the war. First as min-ister of defense and later as prime minister and a key member of a multinational coalition, Churchill masterfully managed the situation and never lost his faith in the war’s eventual outcome. He was also brilliantly adept at preparing his nation and its allies for the problems that they would face when peace finally did return.
Explanation:
