"on july 4th 1776 the declaration of indapendace is adopted. in august 1786 shays rebellium erupts.in 1787 the delegates meet in philidelphia to draft the constitution. in 1789 george washington was elected as president. december 15th 1791, the bill of rights is ratified. in 1820 the missouri compromise is created. in 1831, william loyd garrison begins publishing the liberator. in 1852, uncle toms cabin is published. in 1854, the kansas nebraska act is passed in 1859, harpers farry is attacked. november 6 1860, abraham lincoln is elected president. in 1861, missisippi, florida, albama, georgia and louisiana, secede from the us to create the confederate states of america. the civil war took place from 1861 to 1865.on april 14 1865 lincoln is assasinated. in 1870the 15th amendment is ratified giving african americans the right to vote.i dont know if this helps...
Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/1742680#readmore"
brainly.com/question/1742680 this too
Hay dos tradiciones centrales en la historia política de los Estados Unidos. La de Jefferson, liberal y defensora de los derechos de los Estados, y la de Hamilton-Henry Clay-Lincoln, intervencionista y mercantilista, partidaria de un poder federal (central) fuerte. Esta última se tuvo que construir sobre mitos históricos, ya que no representaba la intención de los padres fundadores: los poderes implícitos y la "mentira espectacular" de que primero fue el poder federal y luego los Estados.
La primera dice que el Gobierno Federal tiene no sólo los poderes expresamente citados en la Constitución, sino aquellos que implícitamente son necesarios para conseguir los objetivos reconocidos por ésta. La segunda se cae con sólo leer cualquier historia de ese país, incluso las hamiltonianas. Fue creada por Daniel Webster con el objetivo de justificar la unión frente a la teoría de la anulación (nullification).
Esta última fue formulada expresamente por John Calhoun, pero está basada en sólidos precedentes históricos. La teoría constitucional de la anulación dice que cualquier Estado tiene el derecho de declarar nula cualquier ley creada por el Congreso, si la considera inaceptable e inconstitucional. Su origen no está en Carolina del Sur, sino en Massachussets, que ha alegado al derecho de los Estados a la secesión en cuatro ocasiones: al comienzo de la República cuando se discutían los ajustes de las deudas de guerra, con la compra de Luisiana por Jefferson, durante la guerra de 1812 y tras la anexión de Tejas. En la Convención de Hartford, en 1814, se planteó la secesión por la guerra contra Inglaterra. Plantearon una reforma de la Constitución que daría más poder a los Estados. Por otro lado, Madison y Jefferson habían reconocido el derecho de los Estados a la secesión en las resoluciones de Virginia y Kentucky, en 1798.
Answer:
Capitalism emphasizes the selling off or privatization of state owned industry and dramatic shifts toward a democratic regime.
Explanation:
Capitalism is an economic system in which capital and factors of production are property, that is, owned and controlled by private actors. Production factors, such as natural resources / raw materials, real capital and in some cases also the labor force, as well as production's sales in the form of goods and services, are bought and sold in markets according to the consent of producers and consumers.
However, capitalism is distinguished from market economics: the term capitalism denotes the social relationship in ownership, while market economy is about how resources are controlled and supply and demand affect price formation. Usually these concepts occur in parallel with each other, although other combinations of forms of ownership and economic systems exist (for example, market socialism and capitalist planning economics).
What sets capitalism apart from earlier economic systems is that the surplus in society is spent on increasing productivity rather than economically unproductive projects such as building cathedrals or pyramids. Most Western societies apply some form of capitalism - often regulated by legislation and trade union agreements. The development led to the emergence of mixed economies as well as welfare states and welfare capitalist societies. In mixed economies, privately owned companies are combined with a large public sector, and the market-controlled economy is combined with public planning.
The question is asking to state the reason why did the romans reject the etruscan monarchy and establish a republic and base on my research, the answer would be <span>Rome was initially a monarchy until the Etruscans were exiled. From living in the Estruscan government, the Romans saw and experienced the problems of a monarchy firsthand. When the Romans created the Republic, they loosely modeled the government after the Greek state of Athens' democracy seeing that they had minimal conflict</span>
