Answer:Protect workers rights
Explanation:
The European nation that controlled the lucrative Yangtze river valley is Britain.
<h3>What are European powers?</h3>
The European balance of power can be described as the tenet in international relations .
It should be noted that In 1831 the great powers such as :
- France
- Britain
- Prussia
- Russia
- Austria
It should be noted that these powers were the one that decided that Luxembourg had to remain in William.
However, the great powers w2ere the ones that ere able to allot French-speaking part of the duchy and give to Belgium.
Learn more European powers at:
brainly.com/question/1088352
#SPJ1
That he would find a faster way to the west indies and bring them back spices gold and slaves and silver etc. ... They believed that he would reach power kingdoms that would allow him to bring goods, like spices back to Spain. ... They put pressure on him to make him work harder.
Answer: A balance in Congress between free and slave states.
Explanation:
According to Dr. William Foley of Central Missouri State University, there had typically been a balance of representation between slave and free states. He says, "This balance had been temporarily upset a number of times, but it had always been easy to decide whether states east of the Mississippi River should be slave or free. Mason and Dixon's Line and the Ohio River formed a natural and well-understood boundary between the two sections. No such line had been drawn west of the Mississippi River."
So when the Louisiana Purchase was added to the land of the United States, that set in motion debates over whether states established in the newly acquired territories would be slave or free.
The Louisiana Purchase territories were acquired from France in 1803. Debates over the future of new states in that region continued for the next decade or more. Missouri was a part of what was acquired in the Louisiana Purchase. In 1820, when Missouri was ready to apply for statehood, a compromise was reached in Congress that established a plan for slave vs. free regions within the overall Louisiana Purchase regions. The Missouri Compromise admitted Missouri into the Union as a slave state with Maine being added as a free state at the same time, to keep the balance of slave and free states equal. It also prohibited any future slave states north of the latitude line 36 1/2 degrees north of the equator in territories of the Louisiana Purchase, with the exception of Missouri (north of that line) being admitted as a slave state.
Answer:
In the first phase, clearance resulted from agricultural improvement, driven by the need for landlords to increase their income (many landlords had crippling debts, with bankruptcy playing a large part in the history). This involved the enclosure of the open fields managed on the run rig system and the shared grazing. Especially in the North and West of the region, these were usually replaced with large-scale pastoral farms stocked with sheep, on which much higher rents were paid, with the displaced tenants getting alternative tenancies in newly created crofting communities, where they were expected to be employed in industries such as fishing, quarrying or the kelp industry. The reduction in status from farmer to crofter was one of the causes of resentment from these changes.
Explanation:
he eviction of tenants went against dùthchas, the principle that clan members had an inalienable right to rent land in the clan territory. This was never recognised in Scottish law. It was gradually abandoned by clan chiefs as they began to think of themselves simply as commercial landlords, rather than as patriarchs of their people—a process that arguably started with the Statutes of Iona of 1609. The clan members continued to rely on dùthchas. This different viewpoint was an inevitable source of grievance.35–36, 39, 60, 300 The actions of landlords varied. Some did try to delay or limit evictions, often to their financial cost. The Countess of Sutherland genuinely believed her plans were advantageous for those resettled in crofting communities and could not understand why tenants complained. A few landlords displayed complete lack of concern for evicted tenants.
