Answer:
The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution. The decision in Mapp v. Ohio established that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The decision in Miranda v. Arizona established that the exclusionary rule applies to improperly elicited self-incriminatory statements gathered in violation of the Fifth Amendment, and to evidence gained in situations where the government violated the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel. However, the rule does not apply in civil cases, including deportation hearings. See INS v. Lopez-Mendoza.
Answer:
One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. Any law that uplifts human personality is just. Any law that degrades human personality is unjust.
Martin Luther King Jr. said that.
Group of answer choices.
A. being replaced by videographers.
B. being replaced by crime-scene reconstruction animation.
C. being replaced by security and surveillance cameras.
D. responsible to provide only crucial photographs of the crime scene.
Answer:
A. being replaced by videographers.
Explanation:
Forensic investigation can be defined as a field in criminology that deals with the gathering and analysis of all physical evidences related with a crime, so as to determine the facts and reach a conclusion on the victim and suspect. There are various techniques and software applications or programs used for obtaining and gathering data (informations) about a crime such as ProDiscover Forensic, CAINE, iLook, Sleuth Kit, identiKIT, etc.
In Forensics, the two-dimensional crime-scene images produced by still-life photography are now being replaced by videographers using modern technologies and techniques.
Videographer refers to an individual who is a professional or expert in the production of video-based clips through the use of a video camera. With this technology, forensic investigator are able to gather and analyze crime-scene footages using three-dimensional images or clips obtained from videographers.
When the writers of the Constitution were initially deciding what powers and responsibilities the executive branch—headed by the president—would have, they were heavily influenced by their experience with the British government under King George III. Having seen how the king and other European monarchs tended to abuse their powers, the designers of the Constitution wanted to place strict limits on the power that the president would have. At the same time, they wanted to give the president enough power to conduct foreign policy and to run the federal government efficiently without being hampered by the squabbling of legislators from individual states. In other words, the Framers wanted to design an executive office that would provide effective and coherent leadership but that could never become a tyranny.
Read more: Executive Branch - The Executive Branch And The Constitution - President, Power, Powers, and Framers - JRank Articles https://law.jrank.org/pages/6652/Executive-Branch-Executive-Branch-Constitution.html#ixzz6rIgGN7y3
Answer:
i dunno srry i just really really need point:>
Explanation:
