1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gayaneshka [121]
3 years ago
11

One of the governor's responsibilities is to oversee the formulation of the state recommendations each year. After this is submi

tted
to the General Assembly, they create and pass an appropriations bill that is sent back to the governor to be signed or vetoed.
A. habeas corpus
B. budget
C. legal counsel
D. merit protection
Law
1 answer:
White raven [17]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:12

Explanation:

You might be interested in
3. How does the Criminal Justice and Forensic Science Reform Act propose to combat the problems with
Black_prince [1.1K]

Answer:

the death is just there

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
In what situations would a case to be heard in federal court? 
sasho [114]

Explanation:

bankruptcy cases would be heard in a federal court

3 0
2 years ago
What are less than lethal weapons designed to do
viva [34]
Great can prevent and minimize the number of deaths, while still making sure the criminal doesn’t get away
7 0
2 years ago
How many senators does each state have in congress
dexar [7]

Answer:

2

Explanation: Each state has two congress members to have a equal amount of representation from each state.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Challenges of separation of power
Scrat [10]
In several Supreme Court decisions this decade, the question of whether a constitutional attack on a statute should be considered “as applied” to the actual facts of the case before the Court or “on the face” of the statute has been a difficult preliminary issue for the Court. The issue has prompted abundant academic discussion. Recently, scholars have noted a preference within the Roberts Court for as-applied constitutional challenges. However, the cases cited as evidence for the Roberts Court’s preference for as-applied challenges all involve constitutional challenges which concede the legislative power to enact the provision but nevertheless argue for unconstitutionality because the statute intrudes upon rights or liberties protected by the Constitution. Of course, this is not the only type of constitutional challenge to a statute; some constitutional challenges attack the underlying power of the legislative branch to pass the statute in question. Modern scholarship, however, as well as the Supreme Court, has mostly ignored the difference between these two different types of constitutional challenges to statutes when discussing facial and as-applied constitutional challenges. In glossing over this difference, considerations which fundamentally affect whether a facial or as-applied challenge is appropriate have gone unnoticed. By clearly distinguishing between these two very different types of constitutional challenges, and the respective role of a federal court in adjudicating each of these challenges, a new perspective can be gained on the exceedingly difficult question of when a facial or as-applied challenge to a statute is appropriate. In this Article, I argue that federal courts are constitutionally compelled to consider the constitutionality of a statute on its face when the power of Congress to pass the law has been challenged. Under the separation of powers principles enunciated in I.N.S. v. Chadha and Clinton v. New York, federal courts are not free to ignore the “finely wrought” procedures described in the Constitution for the creation of federal law by “picking and choosing” constitutional applications from unconstitutional applications of the federal statute, at least when the statute has been challenged as exceeding Congress’s enumerated powers in the Constitution. The separation of powers principles of I.N.S. and Clinton, which preclude a “legislative veto” or an executive “line item veto,” should similarly preclude a “judicial application veto” of a law that has been challenged as exceeding Congress’s Constitutional authority.
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A candidate for president must be
    11·1 answer
  • What was the central issue in the Case of Marbury v. Madison?
    6·1 answer
  • Any ideas about the 9-11
    13·2 answers
  • What happens when you file a lawsuit?
    5·1 answer
  • What are ultimate laws?
    11·1 answer
  • A 15-year-old sophomore high school student became pregnant, and the school board required her to attend a special program for p
    7·1 answer
  • Why does robbery consist of the crimes theft and assault?
    10·1 answer
  • Prove to me that you're honest – in less than 250 words. Please do not say something like I just am. Give me evidence and proof.
    9·1 answer
  • I need Help with This
    11·1 answer
  • What does deputy governor danforth represent or symbolize in the court?.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!