1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
trasher [3.6K]
2 years ago
12

“In England a king hath little more to do than to make war and give away places; which in plain terms, is to impoverish the nati

on and set it together by the ears. A pretty business indeed for a man to be allowed 800,000 sterling a year for, and worshipped into the bargain! Of more worth is one honest man to society and in the sight of God, than all the crowned ruffians that ever lived.”
What does that mean?
History
2 answers:
Kazeer [188]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Explanation:

It mean king sacrifice some of his people in war and use some of his wealth make himself famous in history and also in others countries basically he sought for fame by doing all that in opinion.

Rom4ik [11]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

B) one honest man

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which of the following statements is false?
Mariulka [41]
C. The Third Agricultural revolution is also referred to as the Green revolution
5 0
2 years ago
Supreme Court Justices are appointed for a term of
Ksivusya [100]
The Constitution states that Justices " shall hold their Offices during good behavior." This means that the  Justices hold office as long as they choose and can only be removed from office by impeachment.
 
3 0
3 years ago
How did the British respond when American colonists protests against the stamp act
Andrews [41]

Answer:

The end of the Stamp Act did not end Parliament’s conviction that it had the authority to impose taxes on the colonists. The British government coupled the repeal of the Stamp Act with the Declaratory Act, a reaffirmation of its power to pass any laws over the colonists that it saw fit.

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
THIS IS THE ANSWER
likoan [24]

Answer:

A) One way in which industrialization changed social classes in the period from 1750 to 1900 CE is the fact that industrialization increased the social class divide between the middle and upper class and the lower classes. Industrialization benefited the middle and upper classes more than anyone else, therefore increasing the gap between the classes.

B) One way in which industrialization resulted in new roles for women in the period from 1750 to 1900 CE is that it opened up a lot more job opportunities for women, as the workforce was growing rapidly, and needed many more workers than previously required. This forced a lot of companies to open up jobs to women, shifting their previously given role as purely wives and mothers to providers of the household. This was really only the beginning, as women were given more and more roles over the years, mostly thanks to industrialization opening up more opportunities.

C) One way in which industrialization caused changes to cities in the period from 1750 to 1900 CE is that it heavily increased the population, thus creating a larger urban population and attracting more business. The increased population and business within cities allowed technology and industry to really thrive, as with more business, it’s more likely for a city to be well-funded. In short, because of industrialization, it allowed countries to urbanize, as in move more people to the city, increasing industry and making cities an increasingly viable option for economic opportunity. Industrialization completely changed the way cities were viewed.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Hiltlers plan of attack became clear to the nations of Europe when what occured
xz_007 [3.2K]

Answer:

its B

Explanation:

why u ask well they are trying to trick u that it's A but look at it closely the Munich pact said that Germany would take no more land from anyone so he signed it then later he just said ha...I'm Hitler dont trust me anyways its B as Germany's biggest threat was the Soviet union with such a large army of they interfered early on the war they wouldnt be able to hold them back as for Poland if they invaded Poland without a pact Russia would see it as a threat and most likely go in to help Poland further more that is why the pact made it so they split Poland:>

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 1, who wants to be friends???
    11·1 answer
  • The Communist forces of Mao Zedong defeat the Nationalist forces of Chiang Kai-shek. The People's Republic of China is establish
    13·1 answer
  • What are the positive and negative of the progressive era?
    14·1 answer
  • The consumer economy was dependent upon this method of purchasing products during the 1920s in america. .
    10·1 answer
  • On average, juveniles enjoyed lighter sentences during the 1980s and 1990s.
    13·2 answers
  • When did women of color get the right to vote?
    14·1 answer
  • How did foreign officers help general Washington?
    7·2 answers
  • Write About Radha Krishna Love Story?​
    12·2 answers
  • Why is evaporated water so clean
    7·1 answer
  • In what ways are the economic systems different in America, China, and North Korea?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!