B. Never reach your full potential
Answer:
The advantages shared by both sole proprietorship and partnerships are;
1. They are both easy to start are readily affordable to establish
2. Both, individual income sole proprietorship and split income partnership can benefit from tax savings
3. The business affairs of the operators of both models are private
4. Both enjoy limited external regulation
The disadvantages shared by both business models are;
1. The sole proprietorship and the partners in a partnerships are liable (unlimited liability) for the debts of the business
2. The business may end with the death or departure of a partner in a partnership or the owner in a sole proprietorship
3. Difficult to change a partner in a partnership or the sole proprietor in a sole proprietorship
Explanation:
A sole proprietorship is an enterprise model whereby the enterprise is entirely run and owned by one person such that legally there is no distinction between the business owner and the business
A partnership is a business arrangement where two or more people (partners) come together to manage the operations of the business such that they share the profits and liabilities of the business.
Partnership businesses are sometimes formed by professionals such as lawyers and doctors.
1) ariel spying over Cuba produced pictures that showed missile silos being built in Cuba. The design of the silos made it clear they were designed for missiles, and it made no sense for Cuba to put in anything less than nuclear missiles there. Missiles they could not build themselves, so had to come from the Soviet Union.
2) Only minutes. A launch from the Soviet Union to the US only takes about 20 minutes. Depending on the range of the missiles put into the silos, warning time would have been anywhere from 3-10 minutes. Not enough time to verify that it was a launch, and not a detection system malfunction, forcing America to launch immediately, or risk losing its capacity to strike back.
3) A direct attack or invasion of Cuba would have forced the Soviet Union to respond in kind. The USSR simply could not abandon Cuba, without losing all credibility among its allies and vassal states. So they would likely have struck back at the US, probably in Europe. This would have dangerously escalated the tensions, and increased the probability of nuclear war. Other officials believed that a quick,determined strike would not only eliminate the immediate threat of missiles in Cuba, but possibly overthrow the regime and force the USSR to accept the situation. The idea of a naval blockade was a compromise position. A threat of force, but one that allowed the USSR to back off. After all, so long as the missiles were not put into the silos, they were no threat.
