1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
garri49 [273]
3 years ago
13

To a conflict theorist, marriage and families are fascinating because:

Social Studies
1 answer:
Rama09 [41]3 years ago
5 0
This is because of social standings and power struggles. Social class alludes to a gathering of individuals with comparative levels of riches, impact, and status. Sociologists regularly utilize three strategies to decide social class: The target technique measures and breaks down "hard" actualities. The subjective strategy solicits individuals what they think of themselves.
You might be interested in
Why did jamestown settlers have fields so close to their homes?
tia_tia [17]
They needed to
Farm there food and wanted their food to be close to their homes
5 0
3 years ago
It is best for an organization to limit its intensive talent management efforts to its high-potential employees to avoid resentm
ella [17]

Answer:

False is the Answer.

3 0
3 years ago
Suppose your measure of interpersonal aggressiveness involves having trained observers watch the person being assessed in a vari
earnstyle [38]

Answer:

Inter-rater reliability

Explanation:

Inter-rater reliability also called inter rater concordance or inter rater observer reliability measures the level of consistence of observers. In other words it measures how reliable observers are by comparing and measuring the level of agreement of the ratings of the different observers. In the example in the question you would use inter-rater reliability to measure how much the ratings of the observers of interpersonal aggressiveness agree and are therefore reliable.

4 0
3 years ago
Reflection of erosion​
Dafna11 [192]

not sure if this helps but I hope it does

sorry its so long

To date erosion scientists have failed to address — or have addressed inadequately — some of the ‘big questions’ of our discipline. For example, where is erosion occurring? Why is it happening, and who is to blame? How serious is it? Who does it affect? What should be the response? Can we prevent it? What are the costs of erosion? Our inability or reluctance to answer such questions damages our credibility and is based on weaknesses in commonly-used approaches and the spatial and temporal scales at which much research is carried out. We have difficulty in the recognition, description and quantification of erosion, and limited information on the magnitude and frequency of events that cause erosion. In particular there has been a neglect of extreme events which are known to contribute substantially to total erosion. The inadequacy and frequent misuse of existing data leaves us open to the charge of exaggeration of the erosion problem (a la Lomborg).

Models need to be developed for many purposes and at many scales. Existing models have proved to be of limited value, in the real as opposed to the academic world, both because of problems with the reliability of their results, and difficulties (with associated costs) of acquiring suitable data. However, there are some positive signs: models are now being developed for purposes including addressing questions of off-site impacts and land-use policy. Cheap, reliable and technically simple methods of erosion assessment at the field scale are needed. At the global scale, an up-date of GLASOD based on a scientific approach is urgent so that we are at least able to identify erosion ‘hotspots’.

In terms of explanation of erosion, the greatest need is for a full recognition of the importance of socio-economic drivers. The accession of new countries to the EU with different economic and land-use histories emphasises this need. Too often we have left people, especially the farmers, out of the picture. Our approach could be characterised as ‘data-rich and people-poor’.

4 0
3 years ago
In Figure 3, Fk is equal in magnitude but opposite in direction to the kinetic force of friction.
AnnZ [28]

If the kinetic energy is equal in magnitude, then the object would go on forever because there are two forces who cancel each other out.

False

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Thomas Hobbes believed that society was:
    11·1 answer
  • What role do national parties play in financing campaigns?
    15·1 answer
  • If a child was totally isolated (don't think about where their clothes or food come from, they are just away from any living hum
    14·1 answer
  • The assertion that non-formal institutions have no role to play at the processing stage of the system theory is an empty rhetori
    15·1 answer
  • The field research method that turns researchers into participants and participants into researchers is known as ____.
    15·1 answer
  • PLZZ HELP THIS IS OVERDUE
    9·2 answers
  • How did politicians view the nhs?
    13·2 answers
  • Which of these is a grievance from the declaration of independence
    5·1 answer
  • An unusually small hippocampus may be one factor in the development of posttraumatic stress disorder. A small hippocampus is the
    12·1 answer
  • Organizations tend to increase the amount of planning and control closer to the point of execution when:_____.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!