The correct answer is definitely: corruption.
Indeed, the analogy speaks of something rotten and usually what rots are perishable goods as fruit, vegetables and meat. The analogy is using the physical metaphor of putrefaction to show that a state can also putrefy, i.e. be corrupted. A fruit is a physical item; a state is a notion that represents men of power organized and in command of others, using the physical and intellectual resources of the state to run the country.
Shakespeare is using this metaphor to show that moral corruption in turn causes physical corruption. Another notion associated with this analogy is the notion of the body politic versus the body individual. The body individual is the body of a person; the body politic is the state (including the King). King Claudius has murdered King Hamlet and King Hamlets body is rotting in its tomb. Because he was the King of the state, i.e. the body politic, the state is dying and it has been Claudius that has infected it with his corruption.
Marcello’s words foreshadow Prince Hamlet’s discovery of Claudius’ crime.
Answer:
Blank verse
Explanation:
unrhymed
hopefully this helps you out
I don't know if you have answer choices but:
The conflict develops the plot by causing Della to sell something that means a lot to her to display her love for Jim, however in the story this causes a paradox, due to what Jim bought. The conflict develops the plot by created a paradox, and developing characters and the emotions between them.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
the have distinct style of working
Explanation:
please give brainliest
