1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mama L [17]
2 years ago
10

Do you think Alexander the Great should be known as so? why or why not (give evidence)

History
2 answers:
erik [133]2 years ago
5 0
I think Alexander the Great should be known as so for many reasons. One reason being that he served as king of Macedonia from 336 to 323 B.C. During his time of leadership, he united Greece, reestablished the Corinthian League and conquered the Persian Empire.
marshall27 [118]2 years ago
4 0
Alexander the Great build the Largest empire in ancient civil actions in the 33 years he was alive. He lead Greece to their golden age.
Hope this helped!
You might be interested in
What role did chartered companies play in the british domination of india
geniusboy [140]

A chartered company is an association formed by investors or shareholders for the purpose of trade, exploration, and colonization.

The East India Company evolved from a small enterprise run by a group of City of London merchants, which in 1600 had been granted a royal charter conferring the monopoly of English trade in the whole of Asia and the Pacific.

The company received a Royal Charter from Queen Elizabeth I on 31 December 1600, coming relatively late to trade in the Indies.  

The East India Company  was established in 1600 as a joint-stock company with a monopoly of the trade to and from the East Indies. Its political achievements form a large part of the history of the British Empire, and its economic power was enormous, contributing substantially to the national wealth and causing the company to be the centre of most of the economic controversies of the 17th century. The company ended up seizing control over large parts of the Indian subcontinent, colonized parts of Southeast Asia, and colonized Hong Kong after a war with China.

By 1803, at the height of its rule in India, the British East India company had a private army of about 260,000—twice the size of the British Army, with Indian revenues of £13,464,561, and expenses of £14,017,473. The company eventually came to rule large areas of India with its private armies, exercising military power and assuming administrative functions. Company rule in India effectively began in 1757 and lasted until 1858, when, following the Indian Rebellion of 1857, the Government of India Act 1858 led to the British Crown's assuming direct control of the Indian subcontinent in the form of the new British Raj.


6 0
3 years ago
CAUSE
BigorU [14]

Answer:

1. Workers may go on strike. 2. Unemployment rate may drop. 3. Workers might sue a the facility they work at. 4. Some people would agree some may not

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Which of the following best describes the Allied position at the Paris Peace Conference?
Ipatiy [6.2K]
It was sort of mixed for each allied power. The US president (Wilson) of the time introduced and proposed they use the new 14 points, and that didn't say punish Germany for their war crimes. Winston Churchill, however, felt the need to punish Germany. Either way, they went with push the 14 points though, and they did. And many countries signed those points but the US. They still managed to punish Germany through those points. The answer is B.
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Describe how the growth of Alexander’s empire spread Greek culture.
Aleks04 [339]
There are several ways in which the growth of Alexander’s empire spread Greek culture, but the most important way was that culture was imposed wherever he went. 
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
An example of u.S. Isolationism following world war i was
Masja [62]

Answer:

They reduced trade with European countries.

Explanation:

The destruction, the first world war brought to the United States changed its stance towards Europe in the following period which evident from the U.S foreign policies. They reduced trade withe  European national and focused on the domestic issues. They saw the second world war as a European war and therefore took a neutral stance towards it.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Protestants differed from Catholics by insisting what about the priesthood?
    14·1 answer
  • 4. Explain the outcome of the Marbury v. Madison Case.
    13·1 answer
  • How does a theocracy differ from a monarchy?
    12·1 answer
  • What is the act of 1777​
    6·2 answers
  • The US government made broad use of propaganda during World War II to caution people about war.
    14·2 answers
  • What was Hernando de Soto's effect on the populations of the Mississippi<br> rive valley?
    5·1 answer
  • Why would Washington’s reentry into NY have been so important at the end of the war? Help me I have like 10 mins help me please
    12·2 answers
  • How did damage to the U.S. Pacific Fleet at Pearl Harbor affect how the war was fought?
    7·2 answers
  • How did imperialism affect some colonies?
    14·1 answer
  • How did the Liverpool-Manchester Railroad that opened for business in 1830 differ
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!