Answer:
Autonomous Vehicles (AV)
Connectivity
Electrification
Shared Mobility
Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Big Data & Data Analytics
Human-Machine Interface
Blockchain
Explanation:
Answer:
Conflict of interest
.
Explanation:
The scenario depicts a conflict of interest. Rhonda's decision benefits Rhonda at the expense of the company. Rhonda does not fulfill the responsibility to ensure that the company stays profitable, which is a conflict of interest. A conflict of interest, one of the most common ethical issues identified by employees, exists when a person must choose whether to advance his or her own personal interests or those of others.
Answer:
Please see explanation below
Explanation:
Cullumber Company
Bank reconciliation statement
Cash balance per bank statement $7,910.80
Add: Deposits in transit $1,316.30
$9,227.1
Less outstanding checks ($1,975.10)
Adjusted cash balance per bank $7,252
Cash balance per books $6,360
Add Electronics funds transfer received $1,635
Totalled $7,995
Less:
Bank service charge $17
NSF check $690
Error in recording check no. 2480
($384 - $348) $36
Total balance to be deducted ($743)
Adjusted cash balance per books $7,252
Travis may apply for $0 as in the US, consumers who have won a court judgment against a licensee are given reimbursement.
A licensed real estate broker, salesperson, or closing agent's dishonest, fraudulent, or dishonest conduct, or the conversion of trust money, are grounds for compensation under the Real Estate Education, Research, and Recovery Fund.
Every commercial sales transaction must comply with the agency disclosure obligation. A licensee's disclosure of the party(ies) he acts on behalf of in the transaction shall be confirmed in writing.
By the law, Payments from the Real Estate Inspection Recovery Fund are limited to a maximum of $30,000 per license holder and a maximum of $12,500 per transaction.
Learn more about Real Estate Recovery Fund at brainly.com/question/14102448
#SPJ4
Answer:
AFS 2004 market price decline exceeded 2005 market price recovery
No No
The security cannot be classified as available-for-sale because the unrealized gains and losses are recognized in the Income Statement. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are recognized in owners' equity, not earnings.
The second part of the question is somewhat ambiguous. The 2004 price decline could exceed or be exceeded by the 2005 price recovery. The loss in the first year is not related in amount and does not constrain the realized gain in the second year.
The way to answer the question is to read the right column heading as implying that the earlier price decline must exceed the later price recovery. With that interpretation, the correct answer is no.
For example, assume a cost of $10 and a market value of $4 at the end of the first year. An unrealized loss of $6 is recognized in earnings. During the second year, the security is sold for $12. A realized gain of $8 is recognized-the increase in the market value from the end of the first year to the sale in the second year. Thus, the market decline in the first year did not exceed the recovery in year two. (It could have exceeded the recovery in year two but there is no requirement that it must.)
Explanation: