<span>try cases arising under the constitution,federal laws,and treaties</span>
A newborn child qualifies as dependent because it depends on its parents in order to survive.
<span />
Although I believe both Henry and Irma could work for both a manufacturing company and the government as well, I consider more accurate the last statement "<em>They likely have the same employer since both are employed by a Manufacturing company</em>" even though I think they could also have the same or different employer too; its just that the previous statement fails in its predicate when implies that only one of them could work for a manufacturing company or the government; and I believe they both could work for either the government and a manufacturing company.
Since a M.Company could use environmental consulting services to produce <em>eco-friendly</em> items and control the quality of its production; and the government could issue environmental policies and be concerned about controlling the quality of its performance and the outcome of its projects.
Answer:
C) self=determination movements
Answer: b) Not sexual harassment under Title VII
Explanation:
According to the Title VII, any kind of discrimination done by an employer towards the employee and workers based on sex, complexion,race,age,religion etc is prohibited and unacceptable .Under this title sexual harassment is the discrimination based on sex towards an employee.
According to the question,scenario of Jack and Jane is considered the case of sexual harassment under the Title VII as no sexual discrimination is taking place in their working environment or between them.
Other options are incorrect because sexual harassment in Quid pro quo and hostile terms is not depicted from the case mentioned in question about Jack and Jane.Thus, the correct option is option(b).
