Constitution is a set of laws and principles that govern a country or an organization.
Explanation:
Most modern countries have a written constitution in place which is the code for the way the country is run and it contains a set of laws and principles that govern the said country or an organization.
This is usually subject to change according to the passage of time in the place where the constitution is in effect but it exists to give a basic guideline and outline of the principles that govern the said country.
It also makes sure and safeguards the people against the fluctuation in laws.
Answer:
- Some organizations that participated in the Civil Rights Movement include, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People , the Congress of Racial Equality , the Southern Christian Leadership Conference , and the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee.
Their goals were to end racial segregation and discrimination against African Americans.
War promised a lot of African Americans freedom if they completed their task to fight for the country & depending on what war your specifically talking about it also helped them escape things like slavery (this is if you’re talking civil war or something back in the Slave days)Women on the other hand were expected to “pick up slack” and play the mans role and their role as women by doing things like working which was not common for women typically but became common once the men were off at war.
The Whigs faced a different scenario. The victory of James K. Polk (Democrat) over Henry Clay (Whig) in the 1844 presidential election had caught the southern Whigs by surprise. The key element of this defeat, which carried over into the congressional and local races in 1845 and 1846 throughout the South, was the party's failure to take a strong stand favoring Texas annexation. Southern Whigs were reluctant to repeat their mistakes on Texas, but, at the same time, Whigs from both sections realized that victory and territorial acquisition would again bring out the issue of slavery and the territories. In the South in particular, there was already the realization, or perhaps fear, that the old economic issues that had defined the Second Party System<span> were already dead. Their political goal was to avoid any sectional debate over slavery which would expose the sectional divisions within the party.</span>After an earlier attempt to acquire Texas by treaty had failed to receive the necessary two-thirds approval of the Senate, the United States annexed the Republic of Texas by a joint resolution of Congress that required simply a majority vote in each house of Congress. President John Tyler signed the bill on March 1, 1845, a few days before his term ended. As many expected, the annexation led to war with Mexico. After the capture of New Mexico and California in the first phases of the war, the political focus shifted to how much territory would be acquired from Mexico. The key to this was the determination of the future status of slavery in any new territory.
Both major political parties had labored long to keep divisive slavery issues out of national politics. The Democrats had generally been successful in portraying those within their party attempting to push a purely sectional issue as extremists that were well outside the normal scope of traditional politics.[2] However, midway through Polk's term, Democratic dissatisfaction with the administration was growing within the Martin Van Buren, or Barnburner, wing of the Democratic Party over other issues. Many felt that Van Buren had been unfairly denied the party's nomination in 1844 when southern delegates resurrected a convention rule, last used in 1832, requiring that the nominee had to receive two-thirds of the delegate votes. Many in the North were also upset with the Walker tariff which reduced the tariff rates; others were opposed to Polk's veto of a popular river and harbor improvements bill, and still others were upset over the Oregon settlement with Great Britain where it appeared that Polk did not pursue the northern territory with the same vigor he used to acquire Texas. Polk was seen more and more as enforcing strict party loyalty primarily to serve southern interests. Hope This Helps! Can I have Brainliest? Please:)
