1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anna35 [415]
3 years ago
14

First Offense DWI in Texas can result in ______________.

Law
1 answer:
andreev551 [17]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

DWI 1st Offense: A first offense DWI is a Class B misdemeanor. A conviction carries a maximum fine of $2,000 as well as a jail sentence of up to 180 days. ... A first offense conviction will also lead to a license renewal surcharge of up to $2,000 per year for three years.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Harvey is a resident of California. Harvey files an action in Orange County Superior Court, California against Microsoft allegin
enyata [817]

Answer:

They would not win the motion.

Explanation:

Due that Harvey is a resident he can file it their.

5 0
3 years ago
In which of the following ways do utilitarians and Aristotle stand united against Rawls’s liberalism? a) Utilitarians and Aristo
jekas [21]

Answer:

b) Utilitarians and Aristotle both believe that the government should attempt to maximize the aggregate of pleasure minus pain, whereas Rawlsian believe that the government should simply protect rights.

Explanation:

Utilitarians believe that the interest of government should be the same as that of the people, the reason is that, as a whole, the greatest liberty of people is a function of the welfare the people wish to enjoy, and this eads to the possibility and the desirability of progressive social change through peaceful political processes.

At the same time, Aristotle believe that government should govern for the general good or interest of the people, he concluded that, a kind of constitutional democracy, is the most ideal, as it sought for general interest of the people, in which rich and poor respect each other’s rights and the best-qualified citizens rule with the consent of all.

On the contrary, Rawls Liberalism believe that government should only uphold what is ideal, by balancing what is right with justice. According to him, government should protect the citizens, but not necessarily giving in to the aggregate pleasure of the people, that is, doing what is right, which will be supported by reasonable people as against what is considered good.

Hence, Utilitarians and Aristotle both believe that the government should attempt to maximize the aggregate of pleasure minus pain, whereas Rawlsian believe that the government should simply protect rights.

5 0
3 years ago
How do the system of checks and balances work ? ( at least two checks /balances for each brand , with real-world example/current
tekilochka [14]

Answer:

The system of checks and balances work by ensuring no single branch of government has more power than the other. An example of this would be that  the Judicial branch vetoes executive orders. Another example is the executive branch vetoing legislative branch.  Some examples of real-world examples, the legislative branch impeached President Donald Trump. This is a example of check's and balances because the legislative branch is ensuring that the executive branch doesn't overpower the other branches. Another check's and balacnes is that the supreme court is nominated by the president confirmed by the legislative branch.  

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Things about justice
Feliz [49]

Answer:

The components of criminal justice include police, prosecution, judiciary, prisons, probation, and parole.

The criminal justice system has multiple and often conflicting objectives: the interests of the victim have to be balanced with the due process rights of the defendant, the broader public interest, as well as considerations of cost effectiveness.

Preventing crime is at least as important as punishing offenders. The three kinds of situational crime prevention, like robbing a bank, involve increasing the effort that offenders must spend to commit a crime, increasing the risk of detection and reducing the rewards gained by criminal behaviour, for example by lowering the amount of cash held in a facility.

The key principles that guide the practice of criminal justice in Western nations include that criminal prosecution should remain a last resort, that criminal justice interventions should be the minimal response necessary (i.e. if a warning is sufficient, don’t send the offender to prison), and that the severity of the sentence should increase as the crime becomes more serious.

Of all crimes, only about 10 per cent are reported to the police. Reasons for that include that the crime was not that serious, it is felt that the police can’t do anything about it or that the victim is worried of not being believed

There are several different ways to punish an offender: financial penalties, community-based punishment (i.e. imprisonment), community service, a curfew, and a residence requirement, among others.

A suspended prison term is especially effective with young or first time offenders as the mere threat of punishment is often sufficient.

The judicial response to crime varies greatly from one society to another, even though the crime rates are similar. In Holland, for example, imprisonments account for about 7 per cent of all sentences imposed, whereas in the US about 70 per cent of sentences involve custody.

We expect our prisons to punish and to rehabilitate – we want offenders to come out as better people. But even if offenders had a change of mind after getting out of prison, their criminal record sticks with them forever and their employment prospects are greatly diminished, worsening the chances to lead a fulfilled life.

In England, it costs about £38,000 ($60,000) per year to house one prisoner. For this reason alone it is important to ensure that no-one is sent to prison unless it is absolutely necessary.

Explanation:

~Himiko Toga~

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which best describes how the information lobbyists provide to lawmakers is significant? Lobbyists are allowed to provide false i
OleMash [197]

The best option that supports how the information that Lobbyists provides is that lobbyists can present information in a way that supports their clients’ positions.

The lobbyist can be described as a person that  does the job of convincing legislatures and politicians on voting in a particular way.

Lobbyists are able to represent the views of people. They take the views to the legislators for consideration.

Read more on brainly.com/question/10791090?referrer=searchResults

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Ms. Lewis understands that Medicare prescription drug plans may use various methods to control the use of specific drugs. She ha
    9·2 answers
  • how can the growing use of personal health records be used to improve the delivery of health care patient​
    9·1 answer
  • The ancient Greeks practiced_______ by allowing people to vote and government issues
    11·2 answers
  • What are some of the differences between the adult and juvenile court processes and systems?
    15·2 answers
  • In debates leading up to the Three-Fifths Compromise, northern states argued that:  A. slaves should be able to buy their freed
    10·1 answer
  • 22. Some statistics show that a boy who watches his father hit his mother is more likely to hit his own spc
    9·1 answer
  • If you have never been issued a driver license in any other state or country, you are required to
    11·1 answer
  • Is an amount of money paid to the court to ensure that the defendant
    5·2 answers
  • How does the Family Medical Leave Act protect American workers?
    11·1 answer
  • Swimmers were unable to use a city-owned beach for several days because demonstrators protesting city policies had taken over th
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!