1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Svetllana [295]
2 years ago
6

1. Should the US House of Representatives and US Senate have a set protocol for impeaching a federal official? What sort of prot

ocols? Why or why not?
History
1 answer:
Sergeu [11.5K]2 years ago
6 0

Answer and Explanation:

The US House of Representatives and US Senate, possuem um protocolo para que um processo de impeachment seja inicado e finalizado. Ese é um protocolo politico e deve ser realizado para manter o processo de impeachment organizado e pronto para emitir uma decisão absoluta e de acordo com todas as leis vigentes.  

Esse protocolo é realizado com a apuração dos votos dos membros e cada uma das Câmaras do congresso federal, one o apoio de dois terços dos membros é necessário para que o protocolo continue.

You might be interested in
The principle that government can only do what its people give it the authority to do is called
CaHeK987 [17]

Answer:

B. Popular Sovereignty

Explanation:

The other terms have to with the other branches of government and what their powers are.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What main impact did Andrew Jackson have on the geography of the southern states?
m_a_m_a [10]
The main impact that Andrew Jackson have on the geography of the southern states is that he added territory to Florida, Georgia, and Alabama. 
7 0
3 years ago
How did the Supreme Court's decision in Schenck v. United States affect free speech?
Romashka [77]
The correct answer is <span>C. It limited it by saying that opposition to the draft was a danger to the country during wartime.

People who were against world war 1 didn't want others to participate and die in the war so they gave out fliers urging people to not enlist. The supreme court decided that this was not according to the first amendment and wasn't allowed because the country was in a war state and there was a present danger, so they banned it.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did Liu Bang improve the functioning of government?
horrorfan [7]

Answer:He enforced strict rules for workers to ensure job effectiveness.

Explanation:give me brainliest

7 0
3 years ago
A person who takes part in activity with others especially in the operation of a business
Kazeer [188]

A person who takes part in activity with others especially in the operation of a business is regarded as interlocutor.

<h3>What is interlocutor?</h3>

Interlocutor can be regarded as the formal someone that is talking part usually as a representative of a particular organization.

Therefore, interlocutor is a person who takes part in activity with others especially in the operation of a business.

Learn more about interlocutor at;

brainly.com/question/24476975

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which best describes communication in the United States today?
    11·2 answers
  • Who invented the electric trolley car?
    9·2 answers
  • Why did Europeans justify their reasons even though they knew it was bad for the Native Americans? Explain in 5 sentences (1 par
    5·2 answers
  • Who has powers not specifically given to the national government and not forbidden to the states
    11·1 answer
  • 1.   Concerned about the Catholic minority in Maryland, Leonard Calvert ordered the Second Lord Baltimore to 
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the following is true of Egypt
    12·1 answer
  • List 3 predictions FDR makes in his speech
    13·1 answer
  • What was james monroe situation around florida?
    6·2 answers
  • Focus on some of the predictions given in sources 1, 2, and 3. Do you think any of them came true? Fill in
    6·1 answer
  • What is the role of Canada's Governor General ​
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!