<span>All of us are a product of the culture we are raised in, the rules and regulations that we must follow and the spoken and unspoken world views that are passed on. We see the world from our perspective and our reality, we cannot help it, it is the filter we look at life through. Sometimes without even knowing how prejudiced we are, we form our opinions from the experiences we have had and what we have watched as we were growing up. Everything comes from a place deep within us that helps us make sense of the world and the people in it.</span>
Prejudice is a major cause of in-groups as similar minded people, with alike prejudices, might join to form a clique. Some consider cliques to be a social norm, and to "fit in", they feel compelled to join one. Scapegoating a common tactic used by mobs to blame one, or a few individuals, even if there isn't sufficient evidence to prove guiltiness. Equal status contract explains why people form cliques and why they can act hostile to others, but not to people in their "group". Using attribution theory, one can model a situation to determine the causes of actions and behaviors.
Answer:
Anomie is a state of normlessness.
Explanation:
Anomie pertains to a <em><u>social condition where a particular society no longer observes the norms, rules, and values previously present in the said social institution. </u></em>It is a state of normlessness. Emile Durkheim, a sociologist, was the first person who coined this term. Anomie happens when there are drastic changes in society.
In the scenario given in the question, social norms can no longer affect the behavior/conduct of a person preoccupied with monetary success. In previous times, moral conduct is an essential and integrative trait necessary to be well-accepted in society. But, a lot has happened: technological advancement, lifestyle goals, and career aspirations. These ambitions drive people to value money more than conduct.
Answer:
D. They closed the Boston Harbor and limited (but did not withdraw) the colony's right to govern itself
Explanation:
On May 10, 1773, the British Parliament passed the <u>Tea Act</u>. This act allowed British companies to ship tea to the colonies without duties, but the colonists still had to pay a tax on tea.
They were outraged at this display of "taxation without representation", so they tried to boycott the tea and force the ships to return to Britain. This didn't work, so they moved onto their next plan: <u>The Boston Tea Party.</u> On December 10, 1773, a group known as the Sons of Liberty disguised themselves and boarded the ship. They threw thousands of pounds of British tea into the Boston Harbor.
The British found out and they were angry and shocked. They realized the colonies were out of control, so they passed the <u>Coercive/Intolerable Acts.</u> These:
- Closed the Boston Harbor
- Placed the colony under direct British control
- Prevented trials of British officials from occurring in the colonies
- Required British soldiers to be quartered at the colonists' expense
The correct answer is D. They closed the Boston Harbor and limited (but did not withdraw) the colony's right to govern itself. The colony had some power, but it was extremely limited.
B a nonresponse occured
since the data was not complete
