Answer:
A. <u>Yes</u>, because <u>3 + 5 > 6</u>, 5 + 6 > 3, and 6 + 3 > 5
Step-by-step explanation:
I got it wrong and chose B. "<u>No</u>, because <u>3 + 5 > 6</u>, 5 + 6 > 3, and 6 + 3 > 5," but C. "<u>Yes</u>, because <u>3 + 5 < 6</u>, 5 + 6 < 3, and 6 + 3 < 5" and D. "<u>No</u>, because <u>3 + 5 < 6</u>, 5 + 6 < 3, and 6 + 3 < 5" are both wrong because 3 + 5 is not < 6 so the only choice left is A. "Yes, because 3 + 5 > 6, 5 + 6 > 3, and 6 + 3 > 5"
(Ps. its kinda hard to read with all the answers so if if the explanation is confusing just read the bold.)
Answer: Yes , the accuracy rate appear to be acceptable .
Step-by-step explanation:
Let p be the population proportion of the orders that were not accurate .
Then according to the claim we have ,
Since the alternative hypothesis is two-tailed so the hypothesis test is a two-tailed test.
For sample ,
n = 391
Proportion of the orders that were not accurate =
Test statistics for population proportion :-
By using the standard normal distribution table,
The p-value :
Since the p-value is greater that the significance level (0.05), so we do not reject the null hypothesis.
Hence, we conclude that the accuracy rate appear to be acceptable.
Answer:
It would be -4 5/12 or -4.416
Answer:
8
Step-by-step explanation: