c. abab
The rhyme scheme is the pattern of rhyme in a poem. In order to determine the rhyme scheme, you really only need to pay attention to the last word of each line: bower, mingle, flower, dingle. The first line is labeled with the first letter of the alphabet (A). Any lines that rhyme with the first line also end in A. Since bower and flower rhyme, they are both labeled A. The next line that doesn't rhyme receives the next letter of the alphabet: B. Since bower and mingle do not rhyme, mingle is labeled B. Mingle does rhyme with dingle, so it also is labeled B. Therefore the rhyme scheme is
bower A
mingle B
flower A
dingle B
ABAB
Answer:
Her first fact is that only low food yields and poor people can be produced through the use of Traditional agricultural practices. Also traditional practices cannot be used to feed people in Africa in the near future as a result of growing population.
Her opinion is that America and other developed countries should provide Africa with the necessary biotechnology for agriculture so as to prevent suffering and starvation.
Explanation:
Her first fact is that only low food yields and poor people can be produced through the use of Traditional agricultural practices. Also traditional practices cannot be used to feed people in Africa in the near future as a result of growing population.
Her opinion is that America and other developed countries should provide Africa with the necessary biotechnology for agriculture so as to prevent suffering and starvation.
She includes her opinion so that it would be possible for Africa to find a means to sustain agricultural production and the environment.
It is totally a dictionary
The sentence that is correctly construed with an independent clause and a dependent clause is A) As they examined the evidence afresh, they thought of a completely different explanation.
The other sentences don't have dependent clauses, only phrases.
I believe the answer to this is "true." Really, all conclusions on all events are subjective. But considering history, conclusions on events are especially prone to subjectivity. Consider who writes the history books. If one country wins a war against another country, they will write about themselves as the noble party and portray the enemy as villainous. However, this may not be the real case. This occurs much more than we think, and we must research different events to make sure we are not blindly buying into what people say. Hope this helps.
