Answer:
Option A -- there is often a conflict between winning political elections and adoption of only productive programs.
Explanation: It's a known fact that, Government action will often result in the counterproductive use of resources because there is often a conflict between winning political elections and adoption of only productive programs. Therefore, Option B, Option C and Option D are wrong in this context.
Answer:
A.
Explanation:
This act helped recently freed African Americans get on their feet after a lifetime of slavery by providing them with a portion of land to cultivate as their own.
Explanation:
Socrates and Meno both describe that at least virtue is the part of wisdom but we can not say that a most virtuous person is most beneficent only out of knowledge. This is the last point where Socrates and Meno failed to find virtue itself in considering such a virtuous person. This suggests puzzles Meno but Socrates explains that they have been looking for that virtue as a kind of teachable knowledge. The good deeds of virtuous men could equally be the result of not of the knowledge but the opinion.
Even Socrates gives the example of the guide on the road to the Larissa whether the guide has the knowledge and the true opinion about the way that results in the same
Answer:
1. Co-variance= -1.2
2. correlation coefficient= -0.4404
3. There is weak negative relationship between x and y.
Explanation:
1.
Co-variance= Cov(x,y)= sum[(x-xbar)(y-ybar)]/n
xbar=sumx/n=32/5=6.4
ybar=sumy/n=35/5=7
x 7 8 5 3 9
x-xbar 0.6 1.6 -1.4 -3.4 2.6
y 7 5 9 7 7
y-ybar 0 -2 2 0 0
(x-xbar)(y-ybar) 0 -3.2 -2.8 0 0
Cov(x,y)= sum[(x-xbar)(y-ybar)]/n=-6/5=-1.2
Cov(x,y)=-1.2
2.
correlation coefficient=r

x 7 8 5 3 9
x-xbar 0.6 1.6 -1.4 -3.4 2.6
y 7 5 9 7 7
y-ybar 0 -2 2 0 0
(x-xbar)(y-ybar) 0 -3.2 -2.8 0 0
(x-xbar)² 0.36 2.56 1.96 11.56 6.76
(y-ybar)² 0 4 4 0 0

r=-0.4404
3. Since the value of correlation coefficient is negative and less than 0.5 , so, we can say that there is weak negative relationship between x and y.
Answer:
C. Some utility companies now put a smiley or sad face on customers' bills.
Explanation:
The study conducted by Schultz was made to spread awareness among people about their energy consumption, since there is no visible count of how much energy that we use unless we see it in our bills,
The result of the study indicates it is that extremely hard for people to be conscious about how much energy they use on our day to day basis. Most of them surprised about their energy consumption after they receive their feedback.
Using the result of this research, Some utility companies now put a smiley or sad face on customers' bills. Xcel Energy in Minnesota and Commonwealth Edison in Illinois were among those companies.
The smiley face that being put on the bills indicates that the customers were doing a Good job in Energy savings and positively contribute to Environment conservation by reducing energy waste.