Answer:
Prosecutors of this case can use the net worth method to determine the extent these executives have been receiving illegal incomes by computing their wealth at the beginning and at the end of the period under investigation.
There will be an increase in the executives wealth, and since this increase cannot be traced to any legal income source, it will become taxable income, with the calculated penalties and fines.
Explanation:
The net worth method specifies that any increase in wealth, which is not traced to non-taxable sources, should be determined as a taxable income for the period under review. Ordinarily, the net worth is the difference between assets and liabilities. Since the executives use the money personally at their convenience, this will increase their personal wealth.
Answer:
n = ㏒ P ÷ ㏒ (1.08)
Explanation:
Compound interest rate
A = P × 
where
P = principal amount (the initial amount you borrow or deposit)
r = annual rate of interest (as a decimal)
A = amount of money accumulated after n years, including interest.
n = number of years
Since we want the principle amount to double i.e., A = 2P
put this in above equation
2P = P × 
divide both sides by P, we get
P = 
put r = 0.08
P = 
P = 
Taking log on both sides
㏒ P =㏒ 
㏒ P = n ㏒ (1.08)
n = ㏒ P ÷ ㏒ (1.08)
Answer:
A. Take regular EBS snapshots .
Explanation:
-
is incorrect. It lacks durability of EBS volumes.
-
is incorrect. ECT Instance stores are not durable.
-
is incorrect. Mirroring across EBS volumes is pargely inefficient.
-Since EBS snapshots only saves snapshots of the most recent device changes, a great deal of time and memory is saved. Also, only data unique to any particular snapshot is removed in cases of deletion.
a balance achieved between two desirable but incompatible features; a compromise.
"a trade-off between objectivity and relevance"