Answer:
Automatic
Explanation:
Automatic decisions resembles robotizing some other business process you systematize a lot of decides that make an association between the information and how the choice gets made.
As you perceive how well the guidelines work (or not), you adjust the procedure to improve productivity and precision. Furthermore, you make an input circle that continually breaks down the principles against the outcomes they make to fabricate a self-learning, self-amending framework. At long last, you recognize the uncommon cases and exemptions that need extraordinary audit by the human specialists who are best put to make the most troublesome careful decisions.
Answer: <u><em>The given statement is false</em></u>, since "positivism" paradigm that presumes that nature can be studied and comprehended in a logical, scientific manner; stresses objectivity, exactness, and generalization.
Therefore, the following statement; "According to Babbie, one critical review of "positivism" in dismal science research is that individual may not be able to be as verifiable as the knowledge domain ideal presume." is false.
If this question has the same set of options to choose from like the other ones posted previously, then the answer would be: letter B.<span>inhibition of RNA synthesis
</span>
Here are the choices:
<span>A) competitive inhibition with folic acid synthesis
B) inhibition of RNA synthesis
C) injury to plasma membrane
D) inhibition of cell wall synthesis
E) competitive inhibition with DNA gyrase</span>
