The answer would be Person Vs Person because the fishermans wife just wanted more and more from him not thinking about him at all just herself...and there was no other charater in the story but the fish, but the fish was giving the man gifts so he wouldn't be the problem so the wife was the conflict in the story that's why it would be Husband Vs Wife.
I hoped this helped!
Have a great day/night! :)
Answer:
Copy/Paste but change what the bunny is holding.
(\_/)
( •_•)
/ >
Though Brutus’ speech was logical and concise and he thought that the crowd would rally to his cause, he failed to gain. Brutus was demanded the people to listen hear him. He tried to win the people over and support through logical explanations. He listed down the reasons for killing Caesar and was very concise in his speech as he believed the truth will convince the people and rally to his cause. The problem was the people didn’t connect with his arguments and he was too aloof in his approach that he failed to gain their support and he should make a speech wherein he had a personal connection with the crowd.Anthony on the other hand asked the people to hear him. His agreement of the senate’s actions was for the subtle purpose of discrediting all that they said. Listing down the achievements of Caesar, he was all manipulating the crowd by appealing to their emotion. As he made his speech, he was crying and this moved the crowd enabling him to win them over. Anthony was the better orator because of his use of emotion and facts.<span>
</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
I believe it's a satire writing about how we need others to survive. If we can't rely on the people around us, then we become just like savages, and also won't be able to find a good way to live.
I hope this helps!
