It's either B or D ...I'm leaning more towards D tho.
Because it connects Georgia to neighboring states and the rest of the nation, connect Georgia’s major cities, and help move workers from their homes to places of employment in the major cities.
<em>Hey</em><em>!</em><em>!</em>
<em>Here</em><em>'s</em><em> </em><em>your</em><em> </em><em>answer</em><em>:</em>
<em>Jaipur</em><em> </em><em>is</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>highest</em><em>/</em><em>most</em><em> </em><em>populated </em><em>district </em><em>in</em><em> </em><em>Rajasthan</em><em>.</em><em>T</em><em>h</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>population</em><em> </em><em>of </em><em>Jaipur</em><em> </em><em>is</em><em> </em><em>6</em><em>6</em><em>2</em><em>6</em><em>1</em><em>7</em><em>8</em><em>.</em>
<em>Jaipur</em><em> </em><em>is</em><em> </em><em>also</em><em> </em><em>known</em><em> </em><em>as</em><em> </em><em>pink</em><em> </em><em>city</em><em>.</em>
<em>H</em><em>ope</em><em> </em><em>it</em><em> </em><em>will</em><em> </em><em>help</em><em> </em><em>you</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em>
Answer:
unity of effort
Explanation:
Combatant commanders and subordinate joint force commanders work with U.S. ambassadors (or diplomatic missions), Department of State, and other agencies to best integrate the military actions with the diplomatic, economic, and informational instruments of national power in order to promote <u>unity of effort</u>. The aim of each unit working together is to realign their efforts towards achieving a specific goal, each unit of operation possess their own capability. However, working together will ensure unity of efforts towards achieving a specific goal.
Answer: A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss aversion will provide additional motivation
.
Options:
A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss
aversion will provide additional motivation
B. designating a charity should be more effective because it avoids all potential for loss
C. it shouldn’t matter whether one designates a charity or anti-charity
D. self-interest biases generally keep people from choosing the anti-charity
Explanation:
The study of behavioral Economics shows that people are more driven by the loss of fear than the hope of gain. This is known as loss aversion. In commitment contracts where penalty money is promised to a charity or an anti-charity if the goal is not achieved, those who promise their money to an anti-charity tend to achieve their goals more. The same also applies when comparing this group and those who do not have to forego anything if they do not meet their target.
This is because giving to a charity will still seem beneficial while losing the money to an anti-charity will seem like a total loss.
