Science uses experiments to support its explanation
hope this helps
The left hemisphere predominates in language skills for right-handers and most neutrals (left-handers), but neutrals are more variable.
The two hemispheres are connected by a thick band of nerve fibers known as the corpus callosum, which consists of about 200 million axons. The corpus callosum allows the two hemispheres to communicate with each other, allowing information processed on one side of the brain to be shared with the other side.
[Geology] Relating to a strike-slip or left-hand fault where the block above the fault shifts to the left. Also called left heart spondylolisthesis. If it moves to the right, the relative movement is said to be clockwise. A counterclockwise rotation or spiral
[Geology] A strike-slip or right-hand fault in which the blocks on the fault move to the right. If it moves to the left, the relative motion is said to be sinusoidal. Clockwise or helical rotation is also called right-hand rotation.
Learn more about hemisphere at
brainly.com/question/25641436
#SPJ4
Answer:
<em>Burton Malkiel</em> believes that most economists do not write well, therefore students become glassy eyed when studying texts of an economist.
Explanation:
In the foreword of the book<em> "</em>Naked Economics: Undressing the Dismal Science"<em> </em>by <em>Charles Wheelan</em>, <em>Burton Malkiel</em> noted that most economics can not write well and their texts rely mostly on algebraic manipulations and diagrams, only few economists can explain economic analysis in a simple way or show it`s relevance in everyday life. Therefore students get glassy eyed when studying economics.
Answer:
The answer to this question, and especially the text that your question aludes to, can be found on the lumenlearning website, and it says this: that all beings have a three-step process of learning that explains how an organism develops the capacities to behave and act accordingly, depending on the conditions around it. These three steps are: classical conditioning (Pavlovian conditioning), operant conditioning, and finally, observation. All organisms go through these steps to learn how to behave and act in an environment.
Classical conditioning is simply the way that an organism is taught how to respond by association. As an organism experiences its environment, it observes different events and learns how to associate cause and consequence, or responses, to stimuli. During operant conditioning, an organism also associates and also learns that producing a behavior brings either reward, or punishment, and observation is how an organism learns to act through observation and imitation of others.
To me, learning is a much more complex process, in which, all the experiences taken in by an organism, the environment, and also genetics, play all a role together in the way this organism processes all and acquires knowledge and produces responses to that knowledge. But I agree with these theories that all organisms go through steps. You see it with babies. They first learn to act through what they observe, but as intelligent and sapient beings, they too can learn to produce behavior outside of what was observed, or conditioned in them. So, in animals and other beings the three steps mentioned above might work, but not necessarily in humans.
Explanation:
