Most of early history, these was no seperation of church and state, so they were one and the same.
This applies to both the English civil war ( if you can call any war civil) and the Dutch revolt. Both were to end Catholic domination of the Protasant subjects.
All wars are both religious and political. But end up anti-religious as they violate the very tenets of any religion they expound so it is only being about power.
Protasants revolted against the Catholics for freedom but then in-fighting over which Protasant religion is good.
The politics of any war are power and greed. Someone wants what someone else has and demands the right to take it and deny others taking it from them.
Many claim they are trying to protect the ' true' religion or claim for religious freedom and then show they are no better then the heritics they decry and deny others the same freedoms they want,
When all is said and done - all is just for power.
War has never settled any differences. It just pospones the reversal of power as will always happen. The French Revolution almost did by beheading the royals but as many escaped and Napolian brought new ones in. Nothing much changed.
The American revolution - which was the 1st non-religious war started the change for wars to not just be about religion.
Answer:
Your primary occupation means the job you have experience in (within the last ten years) and want to base your immigration application on, if you are invited to apply.
Hope this help welcome!
Answer:
C. That the selling of indulgences to everyday citizens was a sinful practice
Explanation:
Jan Hus, was a Czech theologian and philosopher, rector of the Carolina University in Prague. As a reformer and preacher he is considered one of the precursors of the Protestant Reformation. His followers are known as Hussites. He died burned at the stake after being condemned for heresy at the Council of Constance.
Hus stated that the true Church was invisible and that all those who belong to the Church are its members. The Roman church has an eminent role, but it is not the true Church of Christ, since it taught that only Christ was the head of the Church. He preached that Jesus Christ was the true Stone and not Peter, and said that the pope, with his corruption and his many sins and errors that he taught to people, was the incarnation of the antichrist. Hus's criticisms are directed mainly at Antipope John XXIII, successor of Alexander V, to whom the King of Bohemia had given his obedience. To finance the war against Ladislaus, John XXIII promulgated the preaching of indulgences in Bohemia. The public demonstration of Hus caused the mistrust of the preachers sent by the antipope, which was mainly due to the fact that they were only interested in money and little to explain well the meaning of indulgences to the faithful.
elaboration of hunting tools, stone tools and the most important is the discovery of fire
D. Jackson expresses the opinion that it is a citizen's job to keep the government from falling into disarray, and thereby D is the only choice that makes sense in that context.