Answer:
10
Explanation:
In 2003, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed that in determining any risk, regulators should assume children have 10 times the exposure risk of adults to cancer-causing chemicals. Some health scientists contends that these guidelines are too weak. They suggest that, to be on safe side, we should assume that the risk of harm from toxins is 100 times that of adults. Others support doing this on ethical grounds, they say it is wrong not to give children much greater protection from harmful chemicals in the environment.
Romans did perspective paintings.
Greece was more on objects then on walls or canvas.
Greeks were very quadrangular and blocky. But had lots of shapes.
More Natural and pictures/ paintings were based on what they saw with there eyes.
With human scultures of the human body they were very similar.
Romans was a little finer like on the edges and more tools and that they could work with.
Greeks were a little rougher but still quiet amazing.
The people of Earth face many problems
Struggling just to live and maintain peace.
There's differences in language, faith and race
With misguided hated unwilling to cease.
To solve these problems that plague mankind
We must strive as never before.
Demanding justice with truth in settling disputes
While recalling the loss and heartbreak of war.
War is an emotional release for man
Practiced since the first stones were cast.
Could it be nature's way of thinning the numbers
As the fallen are consumed by the past.
Some have asked why must we study history
It just encourages us to live in the past.
When we forget God and submit to whatever
The sorrows of our sins forever last.
Answer:
Policy owner make a change after the irrevocable beneficiary dies
Explanation:
solution
Policy owner can not policy's coverage or any other benefits unless the beneficiary provides written consent for change or beneficiary dies
and if irrevocable beneficiary has name then owner can not change to policy without consent of beneficiary
so that
Policy owner make a change after the irrevocable beneficiary dies
Answer:
You should think about fair competition.
Explanation:
The ethics question here would be: Is the contribution I'm willing to pay to get the contract a bribery? So, if there are better firms than mine but they don't have the money to pay the contribution, does it mean I get preferential treatment because I can afford it? Wouldn't it be considered unfair by many?
This a common practice in business and although seen morally wrong by many, it is the only way to ensure some contracts are signed. People who advocate this way of dealing with allocating contracts say that it is a fair way, everybody has the opportunity in life to make money and some people would always make more than others. Critics say that it's unfair, especially for smaller firms and developing companies, as their chances to win big contracts are being reduced drastically.
