The greatest equal liberty principle and the difference principle.The first one is that each person is to have an equal right to have the most extensive liberty as another person. The second one is that social differences have to be arranged to favor the least-advantaged society members.
I believe the answer is interactioni<span>sm
</span>interactioni<span>sm is a perspective that viewed the behavior of individuals in a certain social group would affect the behavior of another individual.
Because of this, this perspective tend to study the actions and relationship displayed by members of the group, such as how intimate group members interract with one another.</span>
Between the 1870s and 1900, Africa faced European imperialist aggression, diplomatic pressures, military invasions, and eventual conquest and colonization. At the same time, African societies put up various forms of resistance against the attempt to colonize their countries and impose foreign domination.
A bishop believes that "Kings on Earth should rule with God's authority," which came to be known as 'the Divine Right," or "the Divine right of kings." A French aristocrat has been born into a higher class family and/or was born to a French nobleman. This makes their belief that government rule should only be given to them or someone within their class, as they thought of themselves as the "best" candidates for ruling since they were such noble people. In conclusion, a French aristocrat would not be too happy with the beliefs of the bishop. I hope this helps you out! :)
In the presently stated speech, Laura would be arguing from the point of causation.
<u>Explanation:</u>
When arguing from the point of causation, the speaker or presenter would base her arguments and claims concerning evidence which proves that certain events almost always bring about the same results, or likewise, certain events would always almost eradicate the effects of the events.
Hence here, Laura is speaking from the point of causation.
